1989
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/236.4.929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The constancy of the ratio of the molecular hydrogen lines at 3.8  m in Orion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As has previously been shown (e.g. Brand et al 1988Brand et al , 1989Moorhouse et al 1990) H 2 excitation of the v = 3 and 4 levels cannot be reproduced by C-type shock models. Therefore part of the excitation mechanism may be due to PDR excitation and/or J-type shocks .…”
Section: C-versus J-type Shockmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…As has previously been shown (e.g. Brand et al 1988Brand et al , 1989Moorhouse et al 1990) H 2 excitation of the v = 3 and 4 levels cannot be reproduced by C-type shock models. Therefore part of the excitation mechanism may be due to PDR excitation and/or J-type shocks .…”
Section: C-versus J-type Shockmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The measured ratios of 2-1S(1)/1-0S(1) and 1-0S(2)/1-0S(0) (see Fig. 26) imply that shock (J-shock model from Brand et al 1989) and X-ray excitation are favored, which we investigate in more detail in the following. We used the models of Maloney et al (1996) to compare observed and predicted 1−0S(1), 2−1S(1) and [FeII]λ 1.644 μm fluxes in XDRs.…”
Section: Column Densities and Population Density Diagrammentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Figure 8 (left) shows the diagnostic diagram with the H 2 line ratios 2-1S(1)/1-0S(1) vs. 1-0S(2)/1-0S(0) with the two chosen apertures in blue and red (see e.g., Mouri 1994;Zuther et al 2007;Mazzalay et al 2013b;Smajić et al 2014;Falcón-Barroso et al 2014). Furthermore, we indicate the positions of models for thermal UV excitation (Sternberg & Dalgarno 1989), UV fluorescence (Black & van Dishoeck 1987), X-ray heating (Draine & Woods 1990), shock-heating (Brand et al 1989), and a thermal emission curve. The position in the diagram shows that the H 2 excitation in the two apertures cannot be explained by thermal excitation alone.…”
Section: Emission Line Excitation Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The location of thermal UV excitation (Sternberg & Dalgarno 1989) and non-thermal models (Black & van Dishoeck 1987), as well as the thermal emission curve from 1000 K to 3000 K, are plotted in gray. The X-ray heating models (Draine & Woods 1990) are marked by yellow triangles, the shock-heating model (Brand et al 1989) by a green circle. Right: diagnostic diagram with line ratios 1-0S (1) T vib ≈ T rot .…”
Section: Emission Line Excitation Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%