Recent Experimental and Computational Advances in Molecular Spectroscopy 1993
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-1974-0_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Consistent Force Field: Development of Potential Energy Functions for Conformational Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Molecular mechanics calculations were performed with the Consistent Force Field (CFF) program for conformational analysis, which was further modified to cope with the electrostatic models. Crystal simulations were carried out by using the Williams variant of the Ewald lattice summation method , with a spherical and abrupt cutoff limit of 14 Å and convergence constants of 0.2 Å -1 , 0.2 Å -1 , and 0.0 for Coulomb, dispersion, and repulsion lattice summation terms.…”
Section: Methods and Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Molecular mechanics calculations were performed with the Consistent Force Field (CFF) program for conformational analysis, which was further modified to cope with the electrostatic models. Crystal simulations were carried out by using the Williams variant of the Ewald lattice summation method , with a spherical and abrupt cutoff limit of 14 Å and convergence constants of 0.2 Å -1 , 0.2 Å -1 , and 0.0 for Coulomb, dispersion, and repulsion lattice summation terms.…”
Section: Methods and Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crystal simulations were carried out by using the Williams variant of the Ewald lattice summation method , with a spherical and abrupt cutoff limit of 14 Å and convergence constants of 0.2 Å -1 , 0.2 Å -1 , and 0.0 for Coulomb, dispersion, and repulsion lattice summation terms. The parameters for the set of potential energy functions were determined by combining trial and error guesses with the optimization algorithm which is a variant of the general least-squares method (the Levenberg−Marquardt algorithm). , …”
Section: Methods and Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computer modeling of biomolecular systems and large organic molecules is currently dominated by molecular mechanics calculations due to the advantage in speed. Several high quality force fields, such as AMBER,20, 21 CFF,22, 23 CHARMM,24, 25 COMPASS,26 GROMOS,27 SPASIBA,28 MM3,29 MM4,30 OPLS–AA,31 and MMFF9432, 33 have been developed and are commonly used for elucidating structures and properties of molecules in gas, liquid, and crystal phases. Currently, each force field has significant strength in the area where it was specifically parameterized, that is, MMFF94 performs well for predicting the structures and relative conformational energies of a wide range of organic molecules while the OPLS–AA potential is well suited for describing intermolecular interactions 32, 34.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While model 7 keeps the values of the partial charges equal to the charge parameters, model 8 allows the partial charge assignment and neutralization to be done by a special charge redistribution algorithms that is part of the CFF program. 22 In this algorithm the X is treated as a highly electronegative halogen, in accordance with the assumption that the "dummy" atoms represent the electron pair. The partial charge assignments inside the nine molecules due to the charge parameters given in Table 2 are found in Table 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%