1994
DOI: 10.3891/acta.chem.scand.48-0553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Consistent Force Field. 2. An Optimized Set of Potential Energy Functions for the Alkanes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The choice of the potential energy functions is the same as in the previously described and analyzed model, except that the Morse potential is chosen instead of a harmonic function for modeling the bond potential. The reasons for selecting the Morse potential over the quadratic function are: the harmonic potential could not reproduce the diversities in the Cu−N and Cu−O bond lengths, and the satisfactory performance of several force fields which use Morse potentials. , …”
Section: Methods and Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The choice of the potential energy functions is the same as in the previously described and analyzed model, except that the Morse potential is chosen instead of a harmonic function for modeling the bond potential. The reasons for selecting the Morse potential over the quadratic function are: the harmonic potential could not reproduce the diversities in the Cu−N and Cu−O bond lengths, and the satisfactory performance of several force fields which use Morse potentials. , …”
Section: Methods and Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for selecting the Morse potential over the quadratic function are: the harmonic potential could not reproduce the diversities in the Cu-N and Cu-O bond lengths, and the satisfactory performance of several force fields which use Morse potentials. 45,[66][67][68][69]…”
Section: Methods and Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A coarse distinction of available force fields can be made based on the purpose of the force field, which determines the underlying parametrization strategy. Spectroscopic force fields are designed to investigate gas-phase molecular properties, and their parametrization aims at the accurate representation of molecular geometric, energetic, and vibrational properties, while thermodynamic force fields are designed to investigate condensed-phase properties, the parametrization accordingly aiming at the accurate representation of bulk thermodynamic properties such as, e.g., densities, vaporization enthalpies, or solvation free energies. The present study is concerned with the GROMOS force field for (bio)­molecular simulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a broad perspective, one may distinguish between two main classes of force fields, involving different scopes and design strategies. On one hand, molecular mechanics or spectroscopic force fields, e.g., CFF, , CVFF, MM3, and MM4, mainly aim at an accurate description of molecular properties in the gas phase, e.g., geometries, energies, and vibrational properties. They usually involve few atom types, a complex functional form, e.g., including anharmonicities and couplings in the bonded terms, largely automatized parametrization procedures, and parameters mainly derived on the basis of spectroscopic measurements and QM calculations in the gas phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%