The Consistency of Using Failure Mode Effect Analysis (FMEA) on Risk Assessment of Information Technology

Subriadi, Apol Pribadi; Najwa, Nina Fadilah; Cahyabuana, Brigitta Devianti; Lukitosari, Valeriana

doi:10.1109/isriti.2018.8864467

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The use of FMEA in the IT field still needs to be explored (Lai and Chin, 2014). The consistency of traditional FMEA in the IT field has been proved by (Subriadi et al, 2018). The results of this study prove the inconsistency problem of traditional FMEA.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 61%

“…The first question was answered by testing the Traditional FMEA framework on two different teams in the same case study (Action Research 1) (Subriadi et al, 2018). The second question was answered by aligning the identified FMEA weakness points, diagnosing the causes, and providing the recommendation for solutions.…”

Section: Research Question and Research Objectmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The impact of inconsistent risk assessment results is a critical aspect to be considered by the organization. If FMEA is improperly applied, the organization will perform an incorrect mitigation (Subriadi et al, 2018). This might happen because the high-risk priority requires a higher cost and top priority treatment.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The consistency analysis of failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) in information technology risk assessment

Subriadi

Najwa

2020

Heliyon

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

FMEA is as a method for assessing IT risks. This research aimed to examine the consistency of both traditional FMEA and improved FMEA in IT risk assessment. Improved FMEA is the result of a synthesis framework to minimize consistency in traditional FMEA. Two sets of action research cycles (plan, act, observe, reflect) were applied in this research. Action Research 1 was used to examine and prove the consistency of traditional FMEA. On the other hand, Action Research 2 was applied to examine the consistency of improved FMEA. Tests were carried out by two different teams in the same case study. The consistency was observed in the gap of the RPN results in both teams, and the differences result in both action research cycles. Action Research 1 proved that traditional FMEA was not consistent. The gap in the amount of risk at a very high level was four risks. However, Action research 2 had the same amount of risk at a very high level. Based on the correlation test, the consistency of action research 1 was 0.848 (very large correlation), and the action research 2 was 0.937 (near-perfect correlation). The consistency of improved FMEA proved to be more consistent than traditional FMEA. The limitation of this study was memory issues because both action research cycles were carried out by the same team and with similar case studies. Further research is expected to compare traditional FMEA and improved FMEA in different case studies. The theoretical contribution was the improved FMEA synthesis based on limitations of traditional FMEA. The FMEA team may use Improved FMEA Framework.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 61%

Section: Research Question and Research Objectmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The consistency analysis of failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) in information technology risk assessment

Subriadi

Najwa

2020

Heliyon

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…While Estorilio and Posso highlighted seven factors that contribute to inconsistencies in the automotive industry (Estorilio and Posso 2010), Subriadi et al identified four main causes for inconsistencies: the prioritization methods, the procedures for assessing risks, the skills and knowledge of the teams involved, and the ability of facilitators to conduct FMEA-based risk assessments. (Subriadi et al 2018). Oldenhof et al suggest that in order to overcome this weakness FMEA must be carried out under the supervision of an experienced FMEA-facilitator and that the FMEA team has at least two members with competence in the analytical method (Oldenhof et al 2011).…”

Section: Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (Fmea)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Decentralized Enterprise Risk Management Issues under Rapidly Changing Environments

Bakos

Dumitraşcu

2021

Risks

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Under the growing complexity of manufacturing processes, supply chains, markets and stakeholder expectations, enterprise risk management (ERM) has become an extremely important, probably yet still underdeveloped, management function. Enterprise risk management theory and practice should keep pace with the changes of rapidly changing environments, through new, more adaptive approaches. The article presents some of the results of a longitudinal survey at Eastern-European manufacturing organizations made on risk management techniques. The goal of the research was the study of risk management techniques under rapidly changing environments in highly standardized industries (pharmaceutical and automotive). The research was focused on the role of human resources in handling technology-related/operational risks and to what extent a decentralized risk management is present. Multidisciplinary cooperation, the selection of the teams, communication and the decision making within the team was analysed. During our research few common risk analysis routines were identified at the studied organizations. Through an interview-based qualitative survey, possible weaknesses of common risk identification techniques were identified. The article presents three risk evaluation methods with the same features. The answers provided during the interviews indicate that risk assessment techniques are mostly centralized (coordinated by a single person/unit), linear (based on If-Then construct) and rigid, definitively not suitable when quick changes are in the organization environment.

show abstract

Security risk assessment of online fish quarantine information system using FMEA

Megawati

Okfalisa

Alkarim

2021

PROCEEDINGS OF 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED MATERIALS ENGINEERING &Amp; TECHNOLOGY (ICAMET 2020)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Consistency of Using Failure Mode Effect Analysis (FMEA) on Risk Assessment of Information Technology

Cited by 4 publications

References 10 publications

The consistency analysis of failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) in information technology risk assessment

The consistency analysis of failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) in information technology risk assessment

Decentralized Enterprise Risk Management Issues under Rapidly Changing Environments

Security risk assessment of online fish quarantine information system using FMEA

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About