The Conservation Nexus: Valuing Interdependent Water and Energy Savings in Arizona

Abstract

Water and energy resources are intrinsically linked, yet they are managed separately--even in the water-scarce American southwest. This study develops a spatially explicit model of water-energy interdependencies in Arizona and assesses the potential for cobeneficial conservation programs. The interdependent benefits of investments in eight conservation strategies are assessed within the context of legislated renewable energy portfolio and energy efficiency standards. The cobenefits of conservation are found to be significant. Water conservation policies have the potential to reduce statewide electricity demand by 0.82-3.1%, satisfying 4.1-16% of the state's mandated energy-efficiency standard. Adoption of energy-efficiency measures and renewable generation portfolios can reduce nonagricultural water demand by 1.9-15%. These conservation cobenefits are typically not included in conservation plans or benefit-cost analyses. Many cobenefits offer negative costs of saved water and energy, indicating that these measures provide water and energy savings at no net cost. Because ranges of costs and savings for water-energy conservation measures are somewhat uncertain, future studies should investigate the cobenefits of individual conservation strategies in detail. Although this study focuses on Arizona, the analysis can be extended elsewhere as renewable portfolio and energy efficiency standards become more common nationally and internationally.

Stakeholder Analysis for the Food-Energy-Water Nexus in Phoenix, Arizona: Implications for Nexus Governance

“…Part of the energy generated is then used for water infrastructure to enable conveyance and distribution pumping, groundwater pumping, and drinking-water and wastewater treatment [36]. It is also critical to mention that the Navajo Generating Station (NGS), located in northeastern Arizona (an external input to the AMA FEW system), provides the energy required for the CAP aqueduct, one of the main water sources for our system.…”

A Methodology to Assess the Water Energy Food Ecosystems Nexus in Transboundary River Basins

“…Interestingly, sectoral policies can impose unintended consequences on other sectors even if there is no explicit competition for a single resource, because sectors are interlinked in a network [14]. Where feedbacks are better understood, sectoral policies can positively influence one another, reducing negative impacts or even generating co-benefits [20].…”

Cross-sectional Integration of the Water-energy Nexus in Brazil

“…Some studies have successfully succeeded in this endeavor. This includes Karlberg et al [19], Welsch et al [20], Hermann et al [21], Bartos and Chester [22], Dubreuil et al [23], and Senger and Spataru [24]. The first three of these studies integrated WEAP and LEAP, while the last one added water and land components to an energy model.…”