1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0047-2727(98)00018-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The consequences of overlapping tax bases for redistribution and public spending in a federation

Abstract: Tax and expenditure policies are studied in a federation with imperfectly mobile households. States implement a linear progressive tax and supply a public good. A vertical scal externality, re ecting the e ect of state policies on federal revenues, provides an incentive for state taxes to be too progressive. A horizontal scal externality causes non-optimal states taxes and expenditures because of the migration e ect. The federal government implements its own linear progressive tax and makes transfers to the st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
99
0
5

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
99
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The possible inefficiency arising from more levels of government insisting on the same tax base has already been stressed by the literature on vertical tax externalities (e.g. Keen, 1998;Boadway et al, 1998), but the political effect in terms of a possible reduction of accountability for local governments has been less discussed (but see Cabral and Hoxby, 2012 and Norregaard, 2013 for similar insights). On theoretical grounds, version of our own idea have already been proposed (Besley, 2007) and applied to different outcomes such as the observability of government reporting procedures (Milesi-Ferretti, 2000), government's choice between taxes and debt (Alt and Dreyer Lassen, 2003), the hidden financing of interest groups (Coate and Morris, 1995), the trade off between accountability and efficiency (Bordignon and Minelli, 2001), and the political economic budget cycle (Rogoff et al 1988), among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The possible inefficiency arising from more levels of government insisting on the same tax base has already been stressed by the literature on vertical tax externalities (e.g. Keen, 1998;Boadway et al, 1998), but the political effect in terms of a possible reduction of accountability for local governments has been less discussed (but see Cabral and Hoxby, 2012 and Norregaard, 2013 for similar insights). On theoretical grounds, version of our own idea have already been proposed (Besley, 2007) and applied to different outcomes such as the observability of government reporting procedures (Milesi-Ferretti, 2000), government's choice between taxes and debt (Alt and Dreyer Lassen, 2003), the hidden financing of interest groups (Coate and Morris, 1995), the trade off between accountability and efficiency (Bordignon and Minelli, 2001), and the political economic budget cycle (Rogoff et al 1988), among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…More recently, Wagoner (1995), Wrede (1996), Boadway and Keen (1996), Dalhby (1996), Boadway et al (1997), and Sato (1997) have also addressed this issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also have implications, for example, for distributional policy: Johnson (1988) and Boadway, Marchand, and Vigneault (1998) point out that vertical externalities may induce the states to undertake too much redistribution, perceiving part of the revenue cost to be passed on to the federal government and thereby to other states. Nor has the discussion covered all of the vertical externalities that can arise in federations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%