1996
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.110.5.1096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The consequences of gustatory nerve transection on taste-guided licking of sucrose and maltose in the rat.

Abstract: Lick responses to sucrose and maltose (0.01-1.0 M) were measured in nondeprived rats during brief-access taste trials before and after histologically confirmed gustatory neurotomy. Pronounced decreases in sugar responsiveness occurred after combined section of the chorda tympani (CT) and greater superficial petrosal nerves. The additional section of the glossopharyngeal nerve (GL) flattened the sucrose concentration-response function. Extirpation of the sublingual and submaxillary salivary glands also attenuat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned, the gustatory input from the 10th cranial nerve in the rat is thought to be involved with the protection of the airways. In support, behavioral evidence to date, including the present study, suggests that rats may be aguesic to sucrose and quinine (St. John et al, 1994;Spector et al, 1996b) when only the vagal taste receptors are left intact.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As mentioned, the gustatory input from the 10th cranial nerve in the rat is thought to be involved with the protection of the airways. In support, behavioral evidence to date, including the present study, suggests that rats may be aguesic to sucrose and quinine (St. John et al, 1994;Spector et al, 1996b) when only the vagal taste receptors are left intact.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Percentages of correct responses Ϯ SE as a f unction of stimulus with the normal stimulus array (i.e., the postsurgical test, top panels) and the altered array (lower panels) are shown. Note that the addition of a stimulus that could not be discriminated on the basis of taste (water) did not result in decreased performance to either quinine or KC l. less of quality), f unctions that do not require high resolution between chemical compounds, appear to be subserved by patterns of convergent input from the C T, GSP, and GL, depending on the taste stimulus (Pfaffmann, 1952;Yamamoto and Asai, 1986;Spector et al, 1990bSpector et al, , 1993Spector et al, , 1996bSlotnick et al, 1991;C authon et al, 1994;St. John et al, 1994;St.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the responses to licking alone can be compared with those elicited by tastants. In addition, trained rats have been shown to identify tastants in ϳ200 ms (Halpern and Tapper, 1971), which is about the time frame of one lick cycle (Spector et al, 1996;Travers et al, 1997), but the electrophysiological correlates of rapid tastant identification have yet to be identified. We chose to analyze such multimodal, temporally oscillating responses with a generalized linear model (glm).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CT but not the GL nerve is necessary for the maintenance of normal sodium-specific taste-guided behavior under sodiumdeficient conditions and for the normal unconditioned appetitive responsiveness to sucrose and maltose. 1,2) Denervation of the bilateral GL nerve significantly increased the behavioral similarity (the strength of generalization in the conditioned taste aversion (CTA) paradigm) between monosodium glutamate (MSG) and sodium salts, suggesting that taste information from the GL nerve played a more important role than that from the CT nerve in behavioral discrimination between MSG and the four basic tastes. 3) Resection of the GL nerve altered the acceptability of the bitter-tasting essential amino acid, L-lysine (Lys), due to Lys-deficiency in mice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%