2018
DOI: 10.3386/w25069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Consequences of Academic Match between Students and Colleges

Abstract: Any foolishness the careful reader might uncover is our own damn fault. Please be sure and tell us about it. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
35
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This mismatch might lead to within‐college racial segregation based on academic background or a lower likelihood that URM students admitted under affirmative action will complete college (Arcidiacono, Khan, & Vigdor, ). Other studies, however, indicate no significant negative effects of academic mismatch (Bowen & Bok, ; Dillon & Smith, ). In order to inform this line of research, we use our simulations to assess the extent to which race‐ and SES‐based affirmative action policies might place URM students in colleges where their achievement falls substantially below their peers.…”
Section: Race‐neutral Affirmative Action Policiesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This mismatch might lead to within‐college racial segregation based on academic background or a lower likelihood that URM students admitted under affirmative action will complete college (Arcidiacono, Khan, & Vigdor, ). Other studies, however, indicate no significant negative effects of academic mismatch (Bowen & Bok, ; Dillon & Smith, ). In order to inform this line of research, we use our simulations to assess the extent to which race‐ and SES‐based affirmative action policies might place URM students in colleges where their achievement falls substantially below their peers.…”
Section: Race‐neutral Affirmative Action Policiesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…From that analysis, sorting by test scores appears to have changed over time, with more elite institutions evidently becoming more selective. Dillon and Smith () compare mismatch calculated from the NLSY79 sample with that from the NLSY97 sample and find evidence of a “modest decline” between the two samples.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Educational attainment is again dichotomous: college or no college. Dillon and Smith () include college quality in their measure of mismatch as well.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, students with higher HSGPA's who enter a TIU or CT are less likely to graduate with a BA/BSc than students with lower HSGPA's who attend an RIU. Although academic selectivity supports and reinforces student-institution match, these anomalous cases of 'overmatch' (low HSGPA -high selectivity) and 'undermatch' (high HSGPA -low selectivity) further demonstrate how accessing more selective institutions promotes degree completion (Dillon & Smith, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%