2008
DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.6.1560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Consequence Of Secret Prices: The Politics Of Physician Preference Items

Abstract: This paper assesses the implications for policy of recent aggressive efforts by manufacturers to enforce price-confidentiality clauses in contracts with hospitals for purchases of physician preference items (PPIs) such as implantable medical devices. Secrecy clauses prevent hospitals from revealing prices to third parties that help them negotiate prices and to surgeons who specify which device brands and models hospitals purchase. Litigation focused the attention of journalists and policymakers on problems tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Physicians are traditionally considered to be the primary selectors of medical supplies and bear the liabilities associated with the products they use or prescribe, for example, pharmaceuticals, surgical instruments, or medical implants. It is not unusual to find that 60% of a hospital's supply budget is spent on the aptly named physician preference items category (Lerner et al, 2008;Montgomery and Schneller, 2007). Three factors in particular lead to physicians having a high level of discretion in medical supply selection: (1) their professional expertise, (2) the combination of limited price transparency, limited comparative product effectiveness research, and the lack of standardization regarding medical products nomenclature (Lerner et al, 2008;Pauly and Burns, 2008;The Brookings Institute, 2015) and, (3) the high level of service customization required to cater to diverse patient needs (Landry and Beaulieu, 2013).…”
Section: The Physician's Role In Hospital Supply Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physicians are traditionally considered to be the primary selectors of medical supplies and bear the liabilities associated with the products they use or prescribe, for example, pharmaceuticals, surgical instruments, or medical implants. It is not unusual to find that 60% of a hospital's supply budget is spent on the aptly named physician preference items category (Lerner et al, 2008;Montgomery and Schneller, 2007). Three factors in particular lead to physicians having a high level of discretion in medical supply selection: (1) their professional expertise, (2) the combination of limited price transparency, limited comparative product effectiveness research, and the lack of standardization regarding medical products nomenclature (Lerner et al, 2008;Pauly and Burns, 2008;The Brookings Institute, 2015) and, (3) the high level of service customization required to cater to diverse patient needs (Landry and Beaulieu, 2013).…”
Section: The Physician's Role In Hospital Supply Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Registries of postoperative outcomes are maintained for some cardiac devices, such as implantable defibrillators, but not for orthopedic and spine surgery components outside of special organizational contexts such as Kaiser Permanente. 16 Legislation was introduced in 2007 to mandate disclosure of medical device prices, generating much policy debate over the virtues and vices of price transparency. Some hospitals have created technology assessment committees analogous to the pharmacy and therapeutics committees maintained by health plans for making coverage decisions.…”
Section: Information On Performance and Pricementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hospitals are often contractually bound not to disclose pricing of products. In fact, medical device companies have successfully sued to prevent the sharing of pricing information by third parties contracted with hospitals [8]. This nondisclosure clause is estimated to affect 60% of the $112 billion cost of all medical devices [8].…”
Section: Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%