2020
DOI: 10.5614/ejgta.2020.8.1.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The consecutively super edge-magic deficiency of graphs and related concepts

Abstract: A bipartite graph G with partite sets X and Y is called consecutively super edge-magic if there exists a bijective function f : V (G) ∪ E (G) → {1, 2,. .. , |V (G)| + |E (G)|} with the property that f (X) = {1, 2,. .. , |X|}, f (Y) = {|X| + 1, |X| + 2,. .. , |V (G)|} and f (u) + f (v) + f (uv) is constant for each uv ∈ E (G). The question studied in this paper is for which bipartite graphs it is possible to add a finite number of isolated vertices so that the resulting graph is consecutively super edge-magic. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, we show that for = 1, 2, 3, ( ,3 ) = 0. For = 1, 2, 3, label ( , ), ( 1 , ⋯ , ), ( 1 , 2 , 3 ) with (3, 2), (1), (5,4,6); (2,3), (1,4), (6,5,7); and (1, 4), (2,3,7), (5,8,6), respectively. These vertex labelings can be extended to a SEM labeling of ,3 for = 1, 2, 3.…”
Section: The Semd Of Join Product Of Union Of a Star And A Path With mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Firstly, we show that for = 1, 2, 3, ( ,3 ) = 0. For = 1, 2, 3, label ( , ), ( 1 , ⋯ , ), ( 1 , 2 , 3 ) with (3, 2), (1), (5,4,6); (2,3), (1,4), (6,5,7); and (1, 4), (2,3,7), (5,8,6), respectively. These vertex labelings can be extended to a SEM labeling of ,3 for = 1, 2, 3.…”
Section: The Semd Of Join Product Of Union Of a Star And A Path With mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For = 1, 2 and = 4, label ( , ), ( 1 , ⋯ , ), ( 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ) with (3, 2), (1), (4,6,5,7) and (2,3), (1,4), (5,7,6,8), respectively. Moreover, for = 1, 2 and = 5, label ( , ), ( 1 , ⋯ , ), ( 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ) with (2, 1), (3), (4,7,5,8,6) and (3,2), (1,4), (5,8,6,9,7), respectively. It can be checked that these labelings extend to a SEM labeling of ,4 and ,5 for = 1, 2.…”
Section: The Semd Of Join Product Of Union Of a Star And A Path With mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…is concept motivated Figueroa-Centeno et al [14] to introduce the concept of super edge-magic deficiency of a graph. e super edge-magic deficiency (SEMD) of a graph G, μ s (G), is defined as either the minimum nonnegative n such that G ∪ nK 1 is a SEM graph or +∞ if there exists no such n. Moreover, Ichishima et al [15] defined a similar notion for consecutively SEM labeling. e consecutively SEMD of a graph G, μ c (G), is defined to be either the smallest nonnegative integer n with the property that G ∪ nK 1 is consecutively SEM or +∞ if there exists no such n.…”
Section: Lemma 2 (Seementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Conjecture 1 is still open. Meanwhile, in [15], Ichishima et al presented some results on consecutively SEMD of forets with two components, where its components are (non) isomorphic stars and union of paths and stars. In this paper, we study the (consecutively) SEMD of subdivision of double stars.…”
Section: Lemma 2 (Seementioning
confidence: 99%