The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2007
DOI: 10.1002/jps.20804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Connection Between the Steady State (Vss) and Terminal (Vβ) Volumes of Distribution in Linear Pharmacokinetics and The General Proof That Vβ ≥ Vss

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An observation of tissue-plasma partition coefficients being greater than their steady-state values after equilibration and consequently at terminal phase is in agreement with the general statement that V $ > V ss . 1 Hypothetically, the difference between the exactly calculated distribution volumes and the ones obtained by the commonly used equations can be large. For instance, if the parameters were taken as P l-p = 30, P f-p = 0.2, r = 0.55, V = 10 L, and Cl int f u /(rQ) = 5 (keeping the other parameters the same as used to generate Table 1), we would get the exact value of V ss as 74.3 L, whereas the common calculation by Eq.…”
Section: The Accuracy Of the Prediction Of Distribution Volumes By Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…An observation of tissue-plasma partition coefficients being greater than their steady-state values after equilibration and consequently at terminal phase is in agreement with the general statement that V $ > V ss . 1 Hypothetically, the difference between the exactly calculated distribution volumes and the ones obtained by the commonly used equations can be large. For instance, if the parameters were taken as P l-p = 30, P f-p = 0.2, r = 0.55, V = 10 L, and Cl int f u /(rQ) = 5 (keeping the other parameters the same as used to generate Table 1), we would get the exact value of V ss as 74.3 L, whereas the common calculation by Eq.…”
Section: The Accuracy Of the Prediction Of Distribution Volumes By Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, for a linear pharmacokinetic system, V $ ≥ V ss . 1 A substantial difference between V $ and V ss may indicate a relatively slow kinetics of drug transfer between plasma and peripheral tissues (organs) along with the slower elimination process, which, in turn, leads to a possible substantial delay in reaching the steady state in the body (or in certain organ) compared with plasma. 2 Both V ss and V $ are very complicated parameters determined by the physicochemical properties of the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…bolus administration, significant amounts of these drugs reach peripheral compartment during the initial distribution phase, and slow return to the central compartment limits the speed of drug elimination from the body during the elimination phase (Figures 1 and 3A). For such drugs, volume of distribution changes with time as a function of tissue penetration and binding of the drug [37,38]. In this case, the volume of distribution is initially low (V 1 --volume of the central compartment), increases to the higher value (V SS --steady-state volume) when the steady-state is achieved and reaches the maximum value (V b --terminal volume of distribution) during the elimination phase (linear terminal phase) ( Figure 3B and Table 2).…”
Section: Lack Of Distribution Equilibriummentioning
confidence: 99%