1988
DOI: 10.1016/0022-247x(88)90085-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The conjugate point condition for smooth control sets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, when no state constraints are present, the first-order part of this corollary generalizes the results in [MOS98] and [OS95]. When only equality control constraints are present, the statement of Corollary 4.1 has its exact parallel in [ZZ88] for the case where the state is piecewise smooth and the control is piecewise continuous.…”
Section: K (T; δX(t))dµ(t)supporting
confidence: 69%
“…On the other hand, when no state constraints are present, the first-order part of this corollary generalizes the results in [MOS98] and [OS95]. When only equality control constraints are present, the statement of Corollary 4.1 has its exact parallel in [ZZ88] for the case where the state is piecewise smooth and the control is piecewise continuous.…”
Section: K (T; δX(t))dµ(t)supporting
confidence: 69%
“…But, once again, this aspect of the theory varies dramatically between different authors. In [30], for example, it is claimed in an "important remark" that the case when inequality constraints are present is within the scope of the paper, where only the equality constraint case is studied. According to [17], "this is neither clear nor convincing," and the presence of this kind of constraints becomes a crucial feature in the second order conditions obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [5] and [8] one can find some of the first attempts in this direction but, in [32], it is assured repeatedly that both papers are incorrect (this claim is denied by Bernhard in a reply following [32]). In subsequent papers such as [28], [30], [31] and [33], one encounters different definitions of conjugate points which are not all equivalent even if the problems considered are reduced to the same fixedendpoint problem. In the calculus of variations context, however, all these notions coincide, and in this sense all generalize the classical theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One ultimate goal is to obtain results for the optimal control setting by applying the theory for the abstract optimization problem. Another route in accomplishing this goal is to directly study the second variation of the optimal control problem with the given constraints (see e.g., [25], [24]). In the literature, one can find second-order conditions for optimization problems with various types of constraints: equality, inequality, or set valued (e.g., [1], [7], [20]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, one can find second-order conditions for optimization problems with various types of constraints: equality, inequality, or set valued (e.g., [1], [7], [20]). On the other hand, there are second-order necessary conditions for optimal control problems with equality or inequality mixed state-control constraints (see [19], [21], [24]), or for the pure control inequality constraints (see [25]). However, none of these results include the pure-state inequality constraint g(t, x(t)) < 0, where /-dependence of g is only upper semicontinuous.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%