2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0550-3213(02)00033-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The conformal boundary states for SU(2) at level 1

Abstract: For the case of the SU(2) WZW model at level one, the boundary states that only preserve the conformal symmetry are analysed. Under the assumption that the usual Cardy boundary states as well as their marginal deformations are consistent, the most general conformal boundary states are determined. They are found to be parametrised by group elements in SL(2, C).

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
120
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(44 reference statements)
3
120
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As is explained in detail in [14], at the self-dual radius the structure constants are indeed given by these group theoretic expressions. We are only interested in the Virasoro symmetry here, and the different representations are therefore completely characterised by their conformal weight.…”
Section: The Factorisation Property Completeness and Remarks On Nonmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As is explained in detail in [14], at the self-dual radius the structure constants are indeed given by these group theoretic expressions. We are only interested in the Virasoro symmetry here, and the different representations are therefore completely characterised by their conformal weight.…”
Section: The Factorisation Property Completeness and Remarks On Nonmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…As follows from the detailed explanation in [14], the boundary structure constants where (up to an a-independent factor) B α a is the coefficient of the Ishibashi state associated to the representation a in the boundary state labelled by α (in our case, a = (j; , m, n)), while Ξ abc is a product of the bulk OPE coefficient C abc with an element of the fusing matrix. In writing (6.2), the normalisation B α 0 = 1 for the vacuum sector has been chosen; see e.g.…”
Section: The Factorisation Property Completeness and Remarks On Nonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was pointed out in [3] (and at intermediate stages of the calculations in [5]) that the boundary states can also be constructed for g ∈ SL(2, C), and in particular we can setλ = 0 to obtain the non-hermitian theory whose action S NH is in (1.4). The unitary rotation matrix (3.14) becomes a raising operator.…”
Section: Boundary Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that whatever mapρ is required to obtain a defect from a boundary state in the formalism of [1], the corresponding defect has zero matrix elements between 0| and |1/10 8) and so cannot be equal to either D + or D − . Gang and Yamaguchi do not give details on the precise mapρ required to obtain a defect from a boundary state in their formalism.…”
Section: Comparisons With the Results Of Gang And Yamaguchimentioning
confidence: 99%