This chapter discusses accounts of gender variance (with particular emphasis on trans, that is gender transition) in Judaism, Christianity and Islam. It explores acknowledgements of the existence of sex-and gender-variant people within Jewish rabbinic, Christian theological and Islamic jurisprudential writings; addresses theological, ethical and legal objections to gender transition from within these faiths; and points to some trans-positive responses emerging from each tradition.human as male or female, and that changing God's creation is a work of Satan (Qur'an 4:119), a rejection of the divine will (Altinay 2014: 116), and a deception (Haneef 2011: 102-103). Within various hadiths (collections of teachings of Muhammad) there is mention of figures called, in Arabic, khasi and mukhannathun. Khasi probably refers to eunuchs: that is, biological males who had undergone genital alteration, possibly as part of a process of the imposition of colonial rule in order to exert power over them. 1 Mukhannathun might also mean eunuchs, though the term also seems to be used in reference to some homosexual men, or possibly males with variant gender identities who would today likely be figured as trans women. Wim Peumans and Christiane Stallaert note that the interpretation of mukhannathun as meaning "trans woman" is not uncontested, and that mainstream Islamic religious discourse has tended to define them as men "too old to be attracted to women" (Peumans and Stallaert 2012: 118). The hadiths on mukhannathun include one which refers to cursing men who dress as women, and another apparently instructing people to spurn the company of "effeminate" men and "masculine" women. However, there is also evidence in very early Islam of mukhannathun being considered peculiarly holy and blessed, or simply unremarkable. Given that mukhannathun were often given access to women and the domestic realm, and could perform "female" roles such as singing and playing music, but could also take part in public discourse in a way women could not, there may have been some perceived advantages attached to mukhannath identity (Kugle 2010: 254).Scott Siraj al-Haqq Kugle remarks, "Most early Muslims recognized that the mukhannath acted in gender-ambiguous ways because of their innate disposition and that this was not in and of itself blameworthy" (Kugle 2010: 253). Early commentators in the first centuries after the foundation of Islam distinguished between mukhannathun who were merely effeminate and those who engaged in immoral behavior (i.e. same-sex sexual activity), and between those who acted because of their natural inclinations and those thought to have nefarious purposes (Kugle 2010: 253). At this stage, "genuine" mukhannathun were not condemned, but only those who "affected" effeminate behaviour against their own true natures. To some extent this anticipates more recent Islamic (especially Shi'a) accounts in which trans identity is constructed as a medical issue in order that medical intervention may be deemed the correct response to it (whereas ...