2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11251-018-9478-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The concreteness of titles affects metacognition and study motivation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 89 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies show that students often encounter difficulties understanding and constructing such texts (Mauli et al., 2014; Orsolini, 1993), and efforts to overcome those difficulties are made, for example, by developing a web‐based interactive argumentation system (Fan et al., 2020). These difficulties are expressed at all education levels: from preschoolers who encounter difficulties using arguments to justify their claims (Stein & Miller, 1993), through school students whose metacognitive text expectations were found to be affected by the extent of title concreteness (Lippmann et al., 2019); to older students and adults who find it hard to present appropriate justifications and to argue with counterclaims, and tend to base their claims on explanations more than on evidence (Kuhn, 1991). Moreover, in the context of our era, researchers observed how students identify the central message of long texts when reading from online sources, and found that students use 10 different spontaneous strategies to generate main idea statements, but that the key messages are usually not comprehended independently without mediation (Ramsay & Sperling, 2011).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies show that students often encounter difficulties understanding and constructing such texts (Mauli et al., 2014; Orsolini, 1993), and efforts to overcome those difficulties are made, for example, by developing a web‐based interactive argumentation system (Fan et al., 2020). These difficulties are expressed at all education levels: from preschoolers who encounter difficulties using arguments to justify their claims (Stein & Miller, 1993), through school students whose metacognitive text expectations were found to be affected by the extent of title concreteness (Lippmann et al., 2019); to older students and adults who find it hard to present appropriate justifications and to argue with counterclaims, and tend to base their claims on explanations more than on evidence (Kuhn, 1991). Moreover, in the context of our era, researchers observed how students identify the central message of long texts when reading from online sources, and found that students use 10 different spontaneous strategies to generate main idea statements, but that the key messages are usually not comprehended independently without mediation (Ramsay & Sperling, 2011).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%