2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2012.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The concept of validation in performance-based fire safety engineering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantitative risk analysis differs from other areas of applied science as it attempts to model events that are unlikely to occur, so the validity of the risk assessment model needs to be verified. Borg et al summarized two major risk interpretations and made recommendations for the validity of risk assessments based on different risk interpretations [37]. Aven explained the general definitions As shown in Figure 4, when "Toxic and harmful gas concentration" transfers from "Critical point not reached" to "Reach the critical point", the probability of "Yes" of "Safety" drops from 0.913 to 0.001, the probability that the "Critical state" is in the state "Yes" increases from 0.04 to 0.799, and the probability of "Yes" of "Casualties" increases from 0.035 to 0.17.…”
Section: Validity Of Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Quantitative risk analysis differs from other areas of applied science as it attempts to model events that are unlikely to occur, so the validity of the risk assessment model needs to be verified. Borg et al summarized two major risk interpretations and made recommendations for the validity of risk assessments based on different risk interpretations [37]. Aven explained the general definitions As shown in Figure 4, when "Toxic and harmful gas concentration" transfers from "Critical point not reached" to "Reach the critical point", the probability of "Yes" of "Safety" drops from 0.913 to 0.001, the probability that the "Critical state" is in the state "Yes" increases from 0.04 to 0.799, and the probability of "Yes" of "Casualties" increases from 0.035 to 0.17.…”
Section: Validity Of Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative risk analysis differs from other areas of applied science as it attempts to model events that are unlikely to occur, so the validity of the risk assessment model needs to be verified. Borg et al summarized two major risk interpretations and made recommendations for the validity of risk assessments based on different risk interpretations [37]. Aven explained the general definitions of different types of validity in more detail and summarized the scope and methods of different validity definitions [38].…”
Section: Validity Of Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8][9] In addition, fire safety engineering represents the use of scientific and engineering rules, facts, basics, tents and expert opinion based on an insight on the phenomena, and the impacts of fire and of human reaction to fire in order to protect people, property, and the environment from the harsh effects of fires. 10 The misuse of buildings, insufficiency of suitable maintenance of fire service domains, lack of necessary building equipment, damaged doors, and inappropriateness of escape and emergency exits lead to deadly fires. 11 The implementation of an appropriate safety management system is a preventive action for the protection of old buildings from the potential hazards; however, the establishment and improvement of fire safety measures in such buildings is still a requirement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are better flame retardants when hydrocarbons ignite. However, these foams also combine with soil particles on long-term, causing a mixed contamination situation along with the remaining nonignited hydrocarbon (Nolan 2011;Borg and Njå 2013). Therefore, petroleum pollution can be intensified by such firefighting foams, due to their formulation, which is mostly based on fluorinated substances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%