The concept of the Royal Prerogative in parliamentary debates on the
                        deployment of military in the British House of Commons, 1982–2003

Häkkinen, Teemu

doi:10.7227/r.17.2.4

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 13 publications

(4 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A strong relationship between the two parties is based primarily on mutual respect, recognition by both sides of their respective importance for the exercise of democratic action, and the study emphasizes that society does not benefit from their hostile relationship; It makes parliamentarians less willing to disclose information, and journalists' reports on parliament will be objective, reflecting on the free flow of information. on the other hand, the study indicates that the relationship between the journalist and the politician should not be intimate relationship, and if this happens, journalists will be less willing to criticize the government [21].…”

Section: The Nature Of the Relationship Between Journalists And Sourcesmentioning

confidence: 90%

Journalist's relationship with political authority in Egypt 1960-2011

Goda,

Abdi Al- Maged Ibrahim

2022

IJCS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The study of the journalist's relation with political authority in Egypt from 1960 to 2011 seeks to reveal, describe, analyze and interpret the journalist's relation with political authority in Egypt during this period and to reach a model that explains the factors affecting the journalist's relation with political authority. This is by exposing the political, legislative, social and cultural factors affecting the journalist's relationship with political authority during the period of study. This paper aims to reveal the personal characteristics of successive political leaders during the period of study, and their role in shaping the relationship between the journalist and the political authority in Egypt. In addition to revealing the social development, personal characteristics and professional gradations of a sample of prominent journalists during the course of the study, and the role these factors played in shaping the relationship between the journalist and the political authority in Egypt. The study found that the media in general, and the press in particular, play a role in political life, whether by expressing interest groups and opinion leaders, or by relying political systems on them to reach out to the public and promote their policies at home and abroad alike. Media has also proved to be the link between the public on the one hand and political decision makers on the other. The results also confirmed that the media helps the political systems to create public opinion in favor of their policies or to mobilize public opinion against those opposing their policies, which in both cases is a dangerous and vital role. The study also revealed that the mass media can influence the minds and emotions of the public and change their attitudes and behavior in a way that serves their policies and achieves the interests and goals of the political authority. The results of the study also confirmed that the legislation and laws prevailing in each country determine the form of the relationship between the press and the political authority. The results of the study also showed that the forms of relations between journalists and politicians vary, sometimes they are confused, and sometimes stable

show abstract

Section: The Nature Of the Relationship Between Journalists And Sourcesmentioning

confidence: 90%

Journalist's relationship with political authority in Egypt 1960-2011

Goda,

Abdi Al- Maged Ibrahim

2022

IJCS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Th e role of parliaments in the decision-making on war, or parliamentary war powers, have recently become a point of interest (see e.g. Häkkinen 2014aHäkkinen , 2014bDieterich et al 2008Dieterich et al & 2010Peters & Wagner 2011Tyrie 2004), as has the parliamentary oversight of foreign and security policy (see e.g. Herranz-Surrallés 2014).…”

Section: Parliamentary War Powers In Praxismentioning

confidence: 99%

The cultivation of collective judgment in the decision-making on war: the US Congress and contingently manifested war powers

Kronlund

2015

Redescriptions: Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Th e subject of parliamentary war powers has sparked debates of late. Th e role of the US Congress in making US foreign policy and in war-making has been the focus of numerous studies. Debates on the "war-making" powers of the US Congress and the President have also been topical in the United States recently. Th e actions of Barack Obama's administration in the context of Libya (2011), Syria (2013) and, more recently, the discussion on the need to have a new authorization for the use of force because of ISIS, have again ignited discussion about the powers of the President as the Commander-in-Chief vis-à-vis the powers of Congress. Th e topical question is whether and when the President should seek congressional authorization for the use of the US armed forces. Th is paper claims that Congress has constitutionally established war powers, but they are contingently manifested. In order to explicate this, the paper explores the procedures of congressional involvement in war-making, the term used in congressional debates in the early 1970s when the War Powers Resolution was enacted, and illustrates congressional debates on the war powers between the branches of government. Th e selected congressional debates on, and the procedures of, congressional actions related to the possible use of force authorizations in relation to Libya (2011) and Syria (2013) are examined more specifi cally to explicate the (plausible) role of Congress. In so doing, the paper draws on both political and theoretical aspects of discussions on US Congress war powers.

show abstract

The concept of the Royal Prerogative in parliamentary debates on the deployment of military in the British House of Commons, 1982–2003

Abstract: Th e concept of the Royal Prerogative in parliamentary debates on the deployment of military in the British House of Commons,

Cited by 2 publications

References 13 publications

Journalist's relationship with political authority in Egypt 1960-2011

Journalist's relationship with political authority in Egypt 1960-2011

The cultivation of collective judgment in the decision-making on war: the US Congress and contingently manifested war powers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About