2003
DOI: 10.1007/s004070200053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Concept of Existence and the Role of Constructions in Euclid's Elements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…19 Orna Harari has furthermore reconstructed the presuppositions which, for Aristotle, rendered classical syllogisms incompatible with mathematical demonstration. 20 Catherine Goldstein has taught us how to follow mathematical objects and texts from their constitution through to their apparent permanence in time. This permanence allows mathematicians to look at a theorem in a variety of versions, for the later historian to study.…”
Section: Beyond Algebra and The Sixteenth Centurymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Orna Harari has furthermore reconstructed the presuppositions which, for Aristotle, rendered classical syllogisms incompatible with mathematical demonstration. 20 Catherine Goldstein has taught us how to follow mathematical objects and texts from their constitution through to their apparent permanence in time. This permanence allows mathematicians to look at a theorem in a variety of versions, for the later historian to study.…”
Section: Beyond Algebra and The Sixteenth Centurymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Heath seems to have been quite ready to believe that the point of certain Euclidean constructions was as existence proofs: "The use of actual construction as a method of proving the existence of figures having certain properties is one of the characteristics of the Elements" (Euclid 1908, 234). (More recent scholars have often argued that the problems are in fact to show that certain figures can be constructed under the specified restrictions (Saito 2012;Harari 2003).) Heath's position was one which had its roots in the late antique commentary of , but it is surely no accident that it tended to make (some parts of) Greek mathematics comparable to the constructivist programmes of L.E.J.…”
Section: "Mathematics… Is a Greek Science"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…footnote (18), above. 27 Harari has argued against Zeuthen's classical "existential interpretation" of Euclid's constructions (Harari (2003); Zeuthen (1896)). According to her, this interpretation assigns to Euclid three theses that he does not actually endorse, namely that: i ) "the correspondence between a defined term and the reality to which it refers cannot be taken for granted, but it rather should be established by means of proofs" (Harari (2003), 4); ii ) geometrical constructions are "means of justification, i. e., [.…”
Section: Problems In Euclid's Plane Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%