1991
DOI: 10.1163/156854291x00441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Concept of Bone Tissue in Osteichthyes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
100
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
100
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…29 In fact, the lack of osteocytes (as well as the lacunocanalicular spaces) is the only fundamental difference between the bones of the majority of teleost fish species (particularly the more derived ones) and those of all tetrapods. 26,[30][31][32][33] The fact that there are many extant taxa of osteocytic ('cellular') boned fishes, offers a fantastic palette for comparing the role of bone cells in acellular and cellular bone, but also for investigating the effects of osteocyte loss on a phylogenetic scale (especially since acellularity evolved independently several times within fishes). 34 The evolution of acellular bone from cellular-boned ancestors, and the dominance of this character in advanced teleosts raise the intriguing possibility that a lack of osteocytes brings some functional advantage.…”
Section: Acellular Fish Bonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 In fact, the lack of osteocytes (as well as the lacunocanalicular spaces) is the only fundamental difference between the bones of the majority of teleost fish species (particularly the more derived ones) and those of all tetrapods. 26,[30][31][32][33] The fact that there are many extant taxa of osteocytic ('cellular') boned fishes, offers a fantastic palette for comparing the role of bone cells in acellular and cellular bone, but also for investigating the effects of osteocyte loss on a phylogenetic scale (especially since acellularity evolved independently several times within fishes). 34 The evolution of acellular bone from cellular-boned ancestors, and the dominance of this character in advanced teleosts raise the intriguing possibility that a lack of osteocytes brings some functional advantage.…”
Section: Acellular Fish Bonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with all other forms of connective tissue, bone and cartilage consist of specialised cells and a matrix. Bones are typically made up of three components (Meunier and François 1992;Meunier and Huysseune 1992): (1) bone cells (osteoblasts, osteocytes and osteoclasts); (2) extracellular organic material mainly consisting of collagen fibrils (type I); (3) a mineralised ground substance of proteoglycans and hydroxyapatite crystals, making the bone rigid and strong but brittle. Three kinds of bone tissue can be distinguished on the basis of the three-dimensional organisation of the fibrils: woven-fibred bone, parallel-fibred bone (=pseudo-lamellar bone) and lamellar bone (Meunier 1989;Meunier and François 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three kinds of bone tissue can be distinguished on the basis of the three-dimensional organisation of the fibrils: woven-fibred bone, parallel-fibred bone (=pseudo-lamellar bone) and lamellar bone (Meunier 1989;Meunier and François 1992). However, osteichthyans can lack trapped cells and/or mineral material, illustrating the expression of the great adaptive trends of bone in the various osteichthyan lineages (Meunier and Huysseune 1992). More than half of all teleost species have acellular bone, which has similar histological features to those of cellular bone, except that osteocytes are missing because the cells are not incorporated into the osseous matrix (Moss 1961(Moss , 1963.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations