1996
DOI: 10.1016/s1359-0278(96)00046-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The concept of a random coil: Residual structure in peptides and denatured proteins

Abstract: Non-native states of proteins are of increasing interest because of their relevance to issues such as protein folding, translocation and stability. A framework for interpreting the wealth of experimental data for non-native states emerging from rapid advances in experimental techniques involves comparison with a "random coll' state, which possesses no structure except that inherent in the local interactions. We review here the concept of a random coil, from its global to its local properties. In particular, we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

17
234
0
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 325 publications
(254 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
17
234
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the random coil is often perceived as a protein state lacking any stable structure and, therefore, protection, a brief sampling of this state by a protein does not necessarily expose all of the backbone amides to solvent simultaneously. Since the random coil is a macrostate representing an enormous ensemble of microstates, many of which exhibit some degree of structure and, therefore, protection (28), brief sampling of the U-state does not necessarily lead to a complete exchange of the entire backbone even if the intrinsic exchange rate is very high. This situation can be illustrated using a minimalist representation of a model energy landscape similar to that depicted in Figure 6, which utilizes a Brownian dynamic view of protein conformational kinetics (29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the random coil is often perceived as a protein state lacking any stable structure and, therefore, protection, a brief sampling of this state by a protein does not necessarily expose all of the backbone amides to solvent simultaneously. Since the random coil is a macrostate representing an enormous ensemble of microstates, many of which exhibit some degree of structure and, therefore, protection (28), brief sampling of the U-state does not necessarily lead to a complete exchange of the entire backbone even if the intrinsic exchange rate is very high. This situation can be illustrated using a minimalist representation of a model energy landscape similar to that depicted in Figure 6, which utilizes a Brownian dynamic view of protein conformational kinetics (29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these previous studies provided valuable insights into the statistical properties of unfolded polypeptide chains, they mainly focused on relatively small and mostly single-domain proteins. 12,14 To verify whether the denatured states of large multi-domain proteins also exhibit similar behaviors upon chemical denaturation, here we investigate the GdnHCl induced unfolding of the F(ab′) 2 fragment of goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (IgG) and also an IgG binding protein, protein A, using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS). FCS is based on correlating fluctuations in emission intensity arising from fluorescent molecules diffusing in and out of a small confocal volume, thus providing a convenient means to measure the diffusion time and hence the molecular size of the diffusing species.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35,36 Two disulfide bridges bring the two Fab arms together to form a unique Y-shaped structure (Figure 1a). Because of its distinctive structural characteristics and the prevalence of antibodies, the folding of F(ab′) 2 as well as its constituent domains has been the subject of many studies. 35-42 Protein A (55.5 kDa), on the other hand, is a component of the cell wall of Staphylococcal aureus and is known to bind to the F C fragment of IgG.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such structures are mostly compact and have appreciable secondary structure content. In contrast, denatured proteins are believed to be unfolded with little secondary structure (Dyson & Wright, 1993;Smith et al, 1996). In addition, there is another key difference: the denatured conformations are preselected by a Boltzmann factor (so that very high energy structures are excluded), while an unweighted energy average is used for the misfolds in Equation I .…”
Section: Relationship Of Zmisfijlds To Experimental Quantitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%