1952
DOI: 10.1007/bf01845805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The concept “individual” in biology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1957
1957
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To operationalize the theory of natural selection we must count individuals, as they are the bearers of fitness. While canonical individuals have often been taken to be multicellular organisms ( Jeuken 1952;Hull 1976Hull , 1980Tauber 1991;Pepper and Herron 2008), the hierarchy of life (e.g., simple prokaryotic cells, eukaryotic cells, multicellular organisms, and eusocial groups) shows that new kinds of individuals have evolved (Buss 1987;Maynard Smith 1988;Maynard Smith and Szathmáry 1995;Michod and Roze 1997). A variety of criteria have been used to define biological individuality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To operationalize the theory of natural selection we must count individuals, as they are the bearers of fitness. While canonical individuals have often been taken to be multicellular organisms ( Jeuken 1952;Hull 1976Hull , 1980Tauber 1991;Pepper and Herron 2008), the hierarchy of life (e.g., simple prokaryotic cells, eukaryotic cells, multicellular organisms, and eusocial groups) shows that new kinds of individuals have evolved (Buss 1987;Maynard Smith 1988;Maynard Smith and Szathmáry 1995;Michod and Roze 1997). A variety of criteria have been used to define biological individuality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of the organism concept often arises in discussions of what constitutes an “individual”. When biologists speak of an “individual”, they usually mean an individual organism (Jeuken, 1952; Sober, 1991; Santelices, 1999; Reif, 2005). It is worth being precise, as philosophers and others sometimes define ‘individual’ much more broadly (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%