1997
DOI: 10.1016/s1352-2310(97)00206-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The concentration, speciation and sources of mercury in Chesapeake Bay precipitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
30
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Hg 0 values are consistent with an annual average concentration of 2.0 to 2.6 ng/m 3 reported for Northeast U.S. locations (NESCAUM 1998) The mean Hg p values are consistent with results of a recent study (Reinfelder et al 2004) performed in New Jersey that measured fine aerosol (PM 2.5 ) mercury concentrations at five sites; mean values ranged from 4.9 to 16 pg/m. 3 The Hg p concentrations found in this current study are similar to background concentrations measured in New York state (7 to 12 pg/m 3 ; Olmez et al 1998) and Florida (4.9 to 9.3 pg/m 3 ; Guentzel et al 2001) but are lower than Hg p concentrations measured in the late 1980s through mid-1990s in rural Michigan (11-22 pg/m 3 ; Keeler et al 1995), rural Vermont (11 pg/m 3 ; Burke et al 1995), northern Wisconsin (25 pg/m 3 ; Fitzgerald et al 1994) and adjacent to the Chesapeake Bay (16 to 21 pg/m 3 ; Mason et al 1997). This difference could be due to a decreasing trend in particulate Hg in recent years as controls on certain mercury sources such as waste incineration have been put in place.…”
Section: Mean Valuesmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The Hg 0 values are consistent with an annual average concentration of 2.0 to 2.6 ng/m 3 reported for Northeast U.S. locations (NESCAUM 1998) The mean Hg p values are consistent with results of a recent study (Reinfelder et al 2004) performed in New Jersey that measured fine aerosol (PM 2.5 ) mercury concentrations at five sites; mean values ranged from 4.9 to 16 pg/m. 3 The Hg p concentrations found in this current study are similar to background concentrations measured in New York state (7 to 12 pg/m 3 ; Olmez et al 1998) and Florida (4.9 to 9.3 pg/m 3 ; Guentzel et al 2001) but are lower than Hg p concentrations measured in the late 1980s through mid-1990s in rural Michigan (11-22 pg/m 3 ; Keeler et al 1995), rural Vermont (11 pg/m 3 ; Burke et al 1995), northern Wisconsin (25 pg/m 3 ; Fitzgerald et al 1994) and adjacent to the Chesapeake Bay (16 to 21 pg/m 3 ; Mason et al 1997). This difference could be due to a decreasing trend in particulate Hg in recent years as controls on certain mercury sources such as waste incineration have been put in place.…”
Section: Mean Valuesmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…For example, precipitation amounts may directly lead to changes in wet deposition loads (NADP, 2011) leading to changes in soil Hg densities (although such effects may be highly nonlinear due to "washout" effects (Lamborg et al, 1995;Landis et al, 2002;Lyman and Gustin, 2008;Mason et al, 1997;Faïn et al, 2011). Further, correlations between annual precipitation and soil Hg may be caused by canopy wash-off and throughfall deposition which in forest ecosystems is a significant deposition flux (Demers et al, 2007;Rea et al, 1996;Graydon et al, 2008a), and such deposition loads likely would be efficiently retained in ecosystems (e.g., soils generally retain more than 90 % of Hg deposited with rainfall; Ericksen et al, 2005;Harris et al, 2007;Graydon et al, 2009;Hintelmann et al, 2002).…”
Section: Sensitivity To Precipitation Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is obviously an underestimation since for properly assessing Hg atmospheric deposition, a longer; at least one year-period of deployment would be necessary. Notwithstanding, taking into consideration this limiting aspects and considering average concentrations per deployment period ( , and present-day deposition estimated for remote sites in northern South America, 18 but are at least one order of magnitude lower than values found close to point sources, [4][5][6]19 where a significant contribution of dry deposition and washed out particles characteristically results in elevated bulk atmospheric deposition rates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%