The Computerized Medical Record as a Tool for Clinical Governance in Australian Primary Care

Abstract

BackgroundComputerized medical records (CMR) are used in most Australian general practices. Although CMRs have the capacity to amalgamate and provide data to the clinician about their standard of care, there is little research on the way in which they may be used to support clinical governance: the process of ensuring quality and accountability that incorporates the obligation that patients are treated according to best evidence.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to explore the capability, capacity, and acceptability of CMRs to support clinical governance.MethodsWe conducted a realist review of the role of seven CMR systems in implementing clinical governance, developing a four-level maturity model for the CMR. We took Australian primary care as the context, CMR to be the mechanism, and looked at outcomes for individual patients, localities, and for the population in terms of known evidence-based surrogates or true outcome measures.ResultsThe lack of standardization of CMRs makes national and international benchmarking challenging. The use of the CMR was largely at level two of our maturity model, indicating a relatively simple system in which most of the process takes place outside of the CMR, and which has little capacity to support benchmarking, practice comparisons, and population-level activities. Although national standards for coding and projects for record access are proposed, they are not operationalized.ConclusionsThe current CMR systems can support clinical governance activities; however, unless the standardization and data quality issues are addressed, it will not be possible for current systems to work at higher levels.

The Melbourne East Monash General Practice Database (MAGNET): Using data from computerised medical records to create a platform for primary care and health services research

“…General practice software in Australia is only in its infancy in truly using contained data to inform clinical decisions 21. Decision support in clinical systems not only requires quality data to inform the computational issues but also drives data quality.…”

Getting on with your computer is associated with job satisfaction in primary care: entrants to primary care should be assessed for their competency with electronic patient record systems

“…17,18 EPR systems also improve prescribing accuracy and safety, and can be used as a tool for clinical governance. 19 Not every issue with primary care computing can be solved by training practitioners how to use their EPR system more. Policy makers need to create an environment where any indicator based on routine data represents an evidence-based improvement in patient care.…”

Systems levers for commissioning primary mental healthcare: a rapid review

“…Studies indicate an almost complete adoption of computerised medical records among Australian GPs (Ludwick et al 2010). Nevertheless, the use of health information systems is suboptimal and difficulties exist regarding system compatibility and standardisation (Pearce et al 2013). Factors that impede the effective use of health information systems are a lack of standardisation of coding systems for diagnosis, lack of standards governing different information systems, lack of patient access to their records, inadequate backup systems, and poor quality control (Pearce et al 2013).…”