2017
DOI: 10.1177/1473325017723700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Computer Social Worker: Regulatory practices, regulated bodies and science

Abstract: Social work assessments, and in turn clinical judgment and intervention practices, are increasingly framed by standardised tools and technologies that are digitised. These tools and technologies mediate social workers’ relationships with services users, while also privileging, and in turn reiterating, particular identities and particular forms of knowledge. In this article, I am interested in how standardised tools and technologies, like computers, operate to mediate the relationship between social workers and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(18 reference statements)
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Drawing on empirical evidence of social workers using Facebook to investigate families, typically without their consent, Cooner et al (2020) show how using digital platforms can infringe human rights to privacy, while also revealing risks to children. Philips (2019) auto-ethnographic work shows how professional judgement and practices are increasingly framed by standardised digital tools and technologies. This growing knowledge about how digital and social media and technologies are emerging in the professional work of social workers and amongst groups of young people cared for in child protection social work is shaping a critical agenda towards recognising the potential of the digital in these contexts.…”
Section: Digital Media and Technology And Social Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing on empirical evidence of social workers using Facebook to investigate families, typically without their consent, Cooner et al (2020) show how using digital platforms can infringe human rights to privacy, while also revealing risks to children. Philips (2019) auto-ethnographic work shows how professional judgement and practices are increasingly framed by standardised digital tools and technologies. This growing knowledge about how digital and social media and technologies are emerging in the professional work of social workers and amongst groups of young people cared for in child protection social work is shaping a critical agenda towards recognising the potential of the digital in these contexts.…”
Section: Digital Media and Technology And Social Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their case notes, like all narratives, are constructed in a particular context, for a particular audience, and for a particular purpose, including as a condition of their continued paid employment. The common structure of the notes may reflect, in part, the nature of much social work practice in the current moment, in which digital tools and technologies standardize work practices and products (Phillips, 2019). But case managers also bend the notes to their own purposes, approaching this job requirement as an opportunity to describe the value they bring as workers, whether by connecting families to resources, commiserating with them, offering guidance, or counseling and praying with them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tyrimų apie technologijas socialinio darbo praktikoje trūksta (Cosner Berzin et al, 2015;Singer & Sage, 2015) ir juose daugiausia dėmesio skiriama pagalbinėms technologijoms, skirtoms konkrečioms klientų grupėms: žmonėms, turintiems atminties sutrikimų ar negalią, nusikaltusiems nepilnamečiams ir kt. (pvz., Nauha et al, 2018) arba kompiuteriui naudoti kasdienėje praktikoje (Phillips, 2019;van de Luitgaarden & van der Tier, 2018;Westwood et al, 2017). Palyginti su psichologijos ar reabilitacijos srities tyrimais, tokį atsilikimą lemia riboti ištekliai, etiniai ir teisiniai klausimai, pasirengimo stoka ir istoriškai susiklostęs socialinio darbo, grįsto tiesioginiu santykiu, pobūdis (Cosner Berzin et al, 2015;Singer & Sage, 2015).…”
Section: įVadasunclassified