1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf00124387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The computer program LUDI: A new method for the de novo design of enzyme inhibitors

Abstract: A new computer program is described, which positions small molecules into clefts of protein structures (e.g. an active site of an enzyme) in such a way that hydrogen bonds can be formed with the enzyme and hydrophobic pockets are filled with hydrophobic groups. The program works in three steps. First it calculates interaction sites, which are discrete positions in space suitable to form hydrogen bonds or to fill a hydrophobic pocket. The interaction sites are derived from distributions of nonbonded contacts ge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
296
0
3

Year Published

1994
1994
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 791 publications
(300 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
296
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Of course nothing prevented this, and indeed such an idea is implicit in the fragment approach and anticipated by computational design methods like LUDI, HOOK, GrowMol, and MCSS (36)(37)(38)(39). Still, late-stage optimization with fragments seems underdeveloped; it can reveal derivatization strategies, both in geometry and in chemotype, that may otherwise remain unknown without an industrial-scale hit-to-lead campaign.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course nothing prevented this, and indeed such an idea is implicit in the fragment approach and anticipated by computational design methods like LUDI, HOOK, GrowMol, and MCSS (36)(37)(38)(39). Still, late-stage optimization with fragments seems underdeveloped; it can reveal derivatization strategies, both in geometry and in chemotype, that may otherwise remain unknown without an industrial-scale hit-to-lead campaign.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One class of docking programs including GOLD [3], DARWIN [4], implementations of AUTODOCK [5] and several others [6][7][8] use genetic algorithms to optimize ligand conformations in the context of the binding site. Other approaches to flexible ligand docking include optimizing the ligands in the context of the binding site, [9][10][11] enumeration of multiple low energy ligand minima followed by energy refinement [12,13] or placing fragments into the binding site for later connection [14][15][16][17]. A common technique for flexible docking is that of anchor-and-grow or incremental construction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ranking or "scoring" of the numerous molecules with a reasonable fit is a nontrivial exercise but, with the application of more elaborate evaluation schemes, improvements are being made (Meng et al, 1992). Another database screening program is LUDI (Bohm, 1992), which describes the active site of a target protein in terms of hydrogen bond donors, hydrogen bond acceptors, and hydrophobic surfaces. This description is then checked for a reasonable match with a similar description of the molecules in the small molecule database.…”
Section: Structure-based Drug Designmentioning
confidence: 99%