2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1908.04334
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Compton Spectrometer and Imager

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theoretical modelling of nucleosynthesis yields predict values close to our upper bounds, which suggests a bright future for the next generation of soft γ-ray telescopes, such as COSI (Tomsick et al 2019), in both, nuclear decay as well as the 511 keV positron annihilation line.…”
Section: Positrons From Classical Novaesupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Theoretical modelling of nucleosynthesis yields predict values close to our upper bounds, which suggests a bright future for the next generation of soft γ-ray telescopes, such as COSI (Tomsick et al 2019), in both, nuclear decay as well as the 511 keV positron annihilation line.…”
Section: Positrons From Classical Novaesupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Nonetheless, a better sensitivity in the MeV range, and therefore a future mission covering the MeV sensitivity gap, such as the recently selected small explorer mission COSI, the Compton Spectrometer and Imager 2 (Tomsick et al 2019)…”
Section: Summary Discussion and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a remarkable result, both in terms of accuracy and precision: current soft γ-ray telescopes suffer from the 'MeV gap' in sensivity (e.g. De Angelis et al 2018;Timmes et al 2019;Tomsick et al 2019), which most of the time allows them to only study the sources inside, or the Milky Way itself. The statistical uncertainties on z 0 we estimate from only using INTEGRAL/SPI data and a simple first-order analytic geometric model are only a factor of a few away from the most precise measurements using star counts or H II regions (17 ± 2 pc), which show a systematic spread of ≈ 12 pc (Karim & Mamajek 2016), however.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%