2015
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dev061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The comprehensiveness of the ESHRE/ESGE classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies: a systematic review of cases not classified by the AFS system

Abstract: STUDY QUESTIONHow comprehensive is the recently published European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE)/European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE) classification system of female genital anomalies?SUMMARY ANSWERThe ESHRE/ESGE classification provides a comprehensive description and categorization of almost all of the currently known anomalies that could not be classified properly with the American Fertility Society (AFS) system.WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADYUntil now, the more accepted classifi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 128 publications
(52 reference statements)
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2). Arcuate uterus was categorized as a variant of normal anatomy (U0) in the European classification because this uterine shape no longer exists in the new system [8,10].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2). Arcuate uterus was categorized as a variant of normal anatomy (U0) in the European classification because this uterine shape no longer exists in the new system [8,10].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The American classification has been traditionally used in many investigations into Müllerian duct anomalies. Few works have utilized the new European classification and assessed its viability [9,10]. This study was therefore undertaken using both classifications in a wide survey of female genital tract anomalies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple classification systems are used to classify female genital tract anomalies. The classification systems include the following: the American Society of Fertility and Sterility (AFSS); the American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM); the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) and the European Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ESGE) 1,9 . Uterus didelphys constitutes 11% of all uterine malformations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The risk of complications depends on fistula hole if it has been extended to such an extent that it involved the nearest pelvic organs and presence of postsurgery inflammatory scared band formation [9]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%