“…174-6. Similar analyses are of course appropriate for the over-confidence, failure to take advice, aggressive acts, invasions, boundary-crossings, treacheries, and cruelties of other kings, especially Cyrus and Darius: see various accounts, e.g., for Cyrus, Lattimore (1939) 29, Immerwahr (1966) 165-7, Waters (1971, 51 -2, Avery (1972), Flory (1987) 95-6, Raaflaub (1987) 244-5, Payen (1991), Fisher (1992) 352-7, Pelling (1996; for Darius, Immerwahr (1966) 169-76, Waters (1971) 58-64, Lateiner (1984 260, Hartog (1988) 32-9, Fisher (1992 On the significance of this emphasis on Persian admission of their committing of injustice in the pursuit of empire (with the possibility of implications for fifthcentury Athenian imperialism), see e.g., Pohlenz (1937) 121-35, Raaflaub (1987 228-9, 241-2. recognize human limits, but there remain many disagreements on the appropriate use of Greek terms to describe them, on whether the focus is on the King's individual faults or on broader cultural traditions, and on the role Herodotus attributes to the divine.…”