2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2007.03.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The composition of liquids coexisting with dense hydrous magnesium silicates at 11–13.5GPa and the endpoints of the solidi in the MgO–SiO2–H2O system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12-13 GPa (Melekhova et al, 2007). Model fits to the data use the melt formulation of Silver and Stolper (1985), with r=1 and K=K(T) (see discussion in main text).…”
Section: Ex-situ Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…12-13 GPa (Melekhova et al, 2007). Model fits to the data use the melt formulation of Silver and Stolper (1985), with r=1 and K=K(T) (see discussion in main text).…”
Section: Ex-situ Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the periclase liquidus field 375 and periclase-forsterite cotectic are poorly constrained by the data. The low temperature extension of the cotectic is chosen to fit the reported Mg:Si ratios of melts in equilibrium with forsterite and various DHMS phases at 13.5 GPa (Melekhova et al, 2007). Previous work on hydrous phase stability and Mg:Si ratios for cotectic melts are also included (Melekhova et al, 2007).…”
Section: The Mgo-siomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such features, when they come into play, influence melting phase relations and chemical transport/fractionation, irrespective of particular tectonic settings. However, the lack of knowledge in the relevant phase equilibria appears to be particularly grim in rock types consisting of hydrous, carbonated mantle peridotite and harzburgite (although see Falloon and Green [1990], Gudfinnsson et al [2008], Keshav and Gudfinnsson [2009], and Mibe et al [2009]), especially given the fact that there continue to be considerable disagreements as to where supercritical (second critical end‐points or singularities) features develop in the system MgO‐SiO 2 ‐H 2 O [ Luth , 1993; Melekhova et al , 2007; Mibe et al , 2007]. Hence given these fundamental uncertainties in the influence of water (with or without CO 2 ) on melting phase relations, the suggestion that water gets expelled (or nearly so) from the rocks during subduction, while carbonate escapes melting‐related events and thereby undergoes subduction to great depths in the Earth [ Dasgupta and Hirschmann , 2004], requires some attention.…”
Section: A Note On the Survival Of Carbonate To Moderately Great Deptmentioning
confidence: 99%