2001
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45477-2_26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Complexity of the Matching-Cut Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is stated in Lemma 5 that Matching-Cut with Roots is NP-complete. This lemma is essentially due to Patrignani and Pizzonia [25] as it immediately follows from the following small observation in their hardness reduction from the Not-AllEqual-3-Satisfiability problem, which is an NP-complete problem [26]. For a given instance of Not-All-Equal-3-Satisfiability, Patrignani and Pizzonia [25] construct a connected graph G of minimum degree at least two with the following property: G contains two disjoint sets F and T of vertices (that compose a so-called false chain and true chain, respectively) such that for every matching-cut M , the sets F and T are in distinct components of G − M .…”
Section: Matching-cut With Rootsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It is stated in Lemma 5 that Matching-Cut with Roots is NP-complete. This lemma is essentially due to Patrignani and Pizzonia [25] as it immediately follows from the following small observation in their hardness reduction from the Not-AllEqual-3-Satisfiability problem, which is an NP-complete problem [26]. For a given instance of Not-All-Equal-3-Satisfiability, Patrignani and Pizzonia [25] construct a connected graph G of minimum degree at least two with the following property: G contains two disjoint sets F and T of vertices (that compose a so-called false chain and true chain, respectively) such that for every matching-cut M , the sets F and T are in distinct components of G − M .…”
Section: Matching-cut With Rootsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…NP-complete ? Its NPcompleteness has been re-proved in [56], and intractability remains valid on bipartite graphs where one class contains only vertices of degree 2 [54] or one vertex class is 3-regular and the other class is 4-regular [49], and also if the input graph is planar with maximum degree 4 or planar without cycles shorter than 5 [16]. On the other hand, the problem is solvable in polynomial time on graphs of maximum degree 3 [22], line graphs and graphs without induced cycles longer than 4 [54], series-parallel graphs [56], claw-free graphs and planar graphs without cycles shorter than 7 [16], graphs satisfying d(u) + d(v) ≤ 6 for all edges (u, v) [49], graphs of diameter 2 [20] and graphs whose line graphs are planar [48].…”
Section: Theorem 19 ([5])mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Cut with Roots is known as Matching Cut with Roots and was proved NP-complete by Golovach, Paulusma and Song [10] (by making an observation about the proof of the result of Patrignani and Pizzonia [14] that deciding whether or not any given graph has a matching cut is NP-complete).…”
Section: (I J)-factor Cut With Rootsmentioning
confidence: 99%