2021
DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2020.582800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Complexity of Comparative Judgments in Assessing Argumentative Writing: An Eye Tracking Study

Abstract: Comparative judgment (CJ) has been recently introduced in the educational field as a means of assessing competences. In this judgement process, assessors are presented with two pieces of student work and are asked to choose which one is better in relation to the competencies being assessed. However, since student work is heterogeneous and highly information loaded, it raises the question as to whether this type of assessment is too complex for assessors to use. Previous research on the topic has operationalize… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
references
References 43 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance