1998
DOI: 10.1006/jfan.1998.3284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Complex Moment Problem and Subnormality: A Polar Decomposition Approach

Abstract: It has been known that positive definiteness does not guarantee a bisequence to be a complex moment. However, it turns out that positive definite extendibility does (Theorems 1 and 22), and this is the main theme of this paper. The main tool is, generally understood, polar decomposition. To strengthen applicability of our approach we work out a criterion for positive definite extendibility in a fairly wide context (Theorems 9 and 29). All this enables us to prove characterizations of subnormality of unbounded … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
103
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concrete conditions (in terms of the β i ) for the existence of such a flat extension are given in [Fi1]. In [CuFi1] we proved that β (2n) has a representing measure supported in [a, b] if and only if there is an r-atomic representing measure supported in [a, b], and that this occurs if and only if H (n) ≥ 0 admits a flat extension for which bH (n) ≥ H x (n) ≥ aH (n); Theorem 5.5 thus refines this result in the case when r ≤ n. [PuVa2], [Rez], [StSz1], [StSz2], [Va1], [Va2]). For instance, a rather concrete Riesz-type condition is obtained in [PuVa1], when K is a compact semi-algebraic set.…”
Section: Existence Of Minimal Representing Measuresmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Concrete conditions (in terms of the β i ) for the existence of such a flat extension are given in [Fi1]. In [CuFi1] we proved that β (2n) has a representing measure supported in [a, b] if and only if there is an r-atomic representing measure supported in [a, b], and that this occurs if and only if H (n) ≥ 0 admits a flat extension for which bH (n) ≥ H x (n) ≥ aH (n); Theorem 5.5 thus refines this result in the case when r ≤ n. [PuVa2], [Rez], [StSz1], [StSz2], [Va1], [Va2]). For instance, a rather concrete Riesz-type condition is obtained in [PuVa1], when K is a compact semi-algebraic set.…”
Section: Existence Of Minimal Representing Measuresmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Recall that subnormal (hyponormal) operators are closable and their closures are subnormal (hyponormal). We refer the reader to [15,7,19] and [20,21,22,23] for elements of the theory of unbounded hyponormal and subnormal operators, respectively.…”
Section: Notation and Terminologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been developed in two main directions, the first is purely theoretical (cf. [39,30,61,18,69,15,16,17,70,71,2]), the other is related to special classes of operators (cf. [13,34,35,36]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the above characterization, we show that some weak-type limit procedure preserves subnormality (this can also be done with the help of either [58,Theorem 3] or [61,Theorem 37]; however these two characterizations take more complicated forms). This is a key tool for proving Theorem 5.2.1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%