2003
DOI: 10.1080/1354060032000097235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The complex development of student-teachers' thinking

Abstract: Studies of student-teacher development have tended to suggest a three-stage model of development in which the novices' concerns shift outwards from an initial preoccupation with self, to a focus on tasks and teaching situations, and finally to consideration of pupil learning. This paper, based on sequence of post-lesson interviews conducted with 25 student teachers following 1-year postgraduate courses within schoolbased partnership schemes of initial teacher education, questions the adequacy of such a model. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
34
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
34
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the older age group, many with existing qualifications and work experiences, particularly in sport and coaching, pedagogical professional practice (PPP) was viewed as more important than pedagogical approach (PA). Research supports the view that pedagogical understandings are built within existing preconceptions (Wubbles, 1992), shaped by personal belief systems (Burn et al, 2003) and influenced through links to previous study and work (Korthagen et al, 2008). This research confirms there were differences in beliefs based on age and prior experiences.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the older age group, many with existing qualifications and work experiences, particularly in sport and coaching, pedagogical professional practice (PPP) was viewed as more important than pedagogical approach (PA). Research supports the view that pedagogical understandings are built within existing preconceptions (Wubbles, 1992), shaped by personal belief systems (Burn et al, 2003) and influenced through links to previous study and work (Korthagen et al, 2008). This research confirms there were differences in beliefs based on age and prior experiences.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…As evidenced in many studies pre-service teachers' pedagogical beliefs and the challenges of changing these beliefs are viewed as complex, influenced by personal belief systems and experiences (Biesta et al, 2015;Burn, Hagger & Mutton, 2003;Ryan et al, 2009;Wubbles, 1992;Korthagen et al, 2006;Pajares, 1992). Additionally, research has shown that the pre-service teachers' pedagogical practices develop when learning links practical classroom experiences involving critical reflection and includes understanding of the subject's pedagogical knowledge (Endacott & Sturtz, 2015;Lee, 2005;Penso & Shoham, 2010;Vamvakoussi & Skopelitit, 2008;Rossum & Hammer, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it was evident there was considerably more focus on knowledge of the students in planning. This echoes Burn, Hagger, Mutton and Everton (2003), who found that a very high regard for students' learning featured in their analysis of the reasons offered by student teachers for their teaching decisions. Therefore, a second sweep of coding, using the typography from Burn et al, was applied to the transcripts.…”
Section: Outcomes Of the Collaborative Projectmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…However, there is ongoing debate as to whether early-career teacher growth can be simplified to such an extent (Burn, Hagger, Mutton & Everton, 2003;Grossman, 1992). Stage models lack acknowledgement that early-career teachers can engage in complex or sophisticated problem-solving.…”
Section: Modelling Teacher Identity Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stage models lack acknowledgement that early-career teachers can engage in complex or sophisticated problem-solving. It has been argued that these frameworks are highly prescriptive, assume that early-career teachers have a limited repertoire of thinking skills, and cannot account for individual difference in teacher competency (Burn et al, 2003;Conway & Clarke, 2003). As such, they pose limitations in a study such as this, which seeks to understand the highly individual process of shaping professional identity.…”
Section: Modelling Teacher Identity Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%