2018
DOI: 10.1080/10668926.2018.1448728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Completion Agenda Impact on Student Affairs Practice in Community Colleges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Baston (2018) noted that for colleges implementing guided pathways reform, student affairs leaders are often not included in the change effort, sharing that change redesign efforts, such as guided pathways, are typically led by academic affairs or other institutional staff. Reforms like guided pathways are whole-college efforts but due to the institutional silo nature of many colleges, student affairs, academic affairs, and other college stakeholders may not work together to support the change (Baston, 2018;Fay et al, 2021;Gill & Harrison, 2018;Kadlec, 2019a). This often results in reform efforts that are not integrated across the campus and fail to be institutionalized, which is what is needed for long-term successful change efforts (Kezar, 2018;Kotter, 2012).…”
Section: Stakeholder Involvement Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, Baston (2018) noted that for colleges implementing guided pathways reform, student affairs leaders are often not included in the change effort, sharing that change redesign efforts, such as guided pathways, are typically led by academic affairs or other institutional staff. Reforms like guided pathways are whole-college efforts but due to the institutional silo nature of many colleges, student affairs, academic affairs, and other college stakeholders may not work together to support the change (Baston, 2018;Fay et al, 2021;Gill & Harrison, 2018;Kadlec, 2019a). This often results in reform efforts that are not integrated across the campus and fail to be institutionalized, which is what is needed for long-term successful change efforts (Kezar, 2018;Kotter, 2012).…”
Section: Stakeholder Involvement Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Provide regular opportunities for leaders to engage in institutional-level conversations and collaboration using new or existing college forums and committees (Bailey et al, 2015;Lester, 2020); • Invite all college stakeholders including boards of trustees to participate in organizational change conversations (Baston, 2018;Fay et al, 2021;Gill & Harrison, 2018;Kadlec, 2019a;Luna-Torres et al, 2017;Smith et al, 2020;Walleser, 2018;Wyner, 2021);…”
Section: Contextual Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La literatura sobre los community colleges es amplia, al tener estas más de un siglo de antigüedad (Gill y Harrison, 2018;Bailey, Smith Jaggars y Jenkins, 2015;Gutek, 2013;Mullin, 2011;Cohen y Brawer, 2003). No obstante, la adaptación de dicho modelo al marco educativo español es totalmente novedosa.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Because the higher-level university administrators became number-focused, the advisors felt hampered in their roles and disagreed with the measurements of retention and completion (Smith-Tyge, 2019). By contrast, Gill and Harrison (2018) studied student affairs professionals at a community college in Ohio and found that these professionals were aware of the Completion Agenda and had no concerns with it. Although this study's results are different from Smith-Tyge's results, the difference may be explained by the different participants in Gill and…”
Section: Impact Of the Completion Agendamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moore (2015) found that faculty felt pressured by completion goals and did not support them because they felt the goals did not support student welfare or quality education. On the other hand, some student affairs professionals supported the completion goals and embraced the changes at their college in support of completion (Gill & Harrison, 2018). Although these studies have found some differences regarding support for the Completion Agenda, all these studies showed a concern for students and meeting their needs.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%