1992
DOI: 10.1016/0040-9383(92)90067-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The complete stable splitting for the classifying space of a finite group

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(This old version was once again distributed in 1990 as MSRI preprint series 00425-91 [32].) During this period, there has been some progress in the subject [27,28,41,20,26,21]. Such updated progress has also occurred in the current version of this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(This old version was once again distributed in 1990 as MSRI preprint series 00425-91 [32].) During this period, there has been some progress in the subject [27,28,41,20,26,21]. Such updated progress has also occurred in the current version of this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…For X = EG, Theorem 6.6 was called the "Minami-Webb formula" in [27,28]. There is a recent interesting preprint of Martino and Priddy [29] on this subject.…”
Section: Proof Of (Ii)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multiplicity of a given stable homotopy type as a wedge summand is equal to the dimension of the corresponding simple module over its endomorphism ring, which is a finite field of characteristic p. Unfortunately, the representation theory of these algebras is not easy to study, though the papers of Martino and Priddy [21] and Benson and Feshbach [4] make some progress in this direction. The paper [21] gives an explicit formula for the multiplicity of a wedge summand as the rank of a certain matrix defined in terms of subgroups and conjugations, while the paper [4] attempts a more abstract description of the simple modules.…”
Section: This Multiplication Makes A(g G) Into a Noncommutative Noetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem is not completely solved even in this case, but rather, it reduces to a well-known problem in modular representation theory-the determination of the simple modules in characteristic p for the finite general linear groups GL(n, F p ). In the remaining sections, we explain some of the ideas of Nishida [26], Martino and Priddy [21] and Benson and Feshbach [4] in the general case.…”
Section: This Multiplication Makes A(g G) Into a Noncommutative Noetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation