The complete mitogenome of <i>Parapoynx crisonalis</i> (Walker, 1859) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae), with phylogenetic relationships amongst three acentropine larval forms

Chen, Qi; Chen, Zi-Shu; Gu, Xing-Shi; Ma, Lan; Wang, Xing; Huang, Guo‐Hua

doi:10.1080/01650424.2017.1330481

Cited by 5 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The downstream analyses were performed on clean data of high quality (Q20 N 90% and Q30 N 85%). The mitogenomes were assembled by the MitoZ v2.4 software package (Meng et al, 2019) based on the reference sequence of the mitogenome of Parapoynx crisonalis (GenBank accession no: KT443883) (Chen et al, 2017).…”

Section: Sequencing and Assemblymentioning

confidence: 99%

Characterization of four mitochondrial genomes of Crambidae (Lepidoptera, Pyraloidea) and phylogenetic implications

Liu

Zhang

et al. 2022

Arch Insect Biochem Physiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Loxostege turbidalis, Loxostege aeruginalis, Pyrausta despicata, and Crambus perlellus belong to Crambidae, Pyraloidea. Their mitochondrial genomes (mitogenomes) were successfully sequenced. The mitogenomes of L. turbidalis, L. aeruginalis, P. despicata, and C. perlellus are 15 240 bp, 15 339 bp, 15 389 bp, and 15 440 bp. The four mitogenomes all have a typical insect mitochondrial gene order, including 13 protein‐coding genes (PCGs), 22 transfer RNA (tRNA) genes, two ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes, and one A + T rich region (control region). The PCGs are initiated by the typical ATN codons, except CGA for the cox1 gene. Most PCGs terminate with common codon TAA or TAG, the incomplete codon T is found as the stop codon for cox2, nad4, and nad5. Most tRNA genes exhibit typical cloverleaf structure, except trnS1 (AGN) lacking the dihydrouridine (DHU) arm. The secondary structure of rRNA of four mitogenomes were predicted. Poly‐T structure and micro‐satellite regions are conserved in control regions. The phylogenetic analyses based on 13 PCGs showed the relationships of subfamilies in Pyraloidea. Pyralidae, and Crambidae are monophyletic, respectively. Pyralidae comprises four subfamilies, which form the following topology with high support values: (Galleriinae + ((Pyralinae + Epipaschiinae)+ Phycitinae)). Crambidae includes seven subfamilies and is divided into two lineages. Pyraustinae and Spilomelinae are sister groups of each other, and form the “PS clade.” Other five subfamilies (Crambinae, Acentropinae, Scopariinae, Schoenobiinae, and Glaphyriinae) form the “non‐PS clade” in the Bayesian inference tree. However, Schoenobiinae is not grouped with the other four subfamilies and located at the base of Crambidae in two maximum likelihood trees.

show abstract

Section: Sequencing and Assemblymentioning

confidence: 99%

Characterization of four mitochondrial genomes of Crambidae (Lepidoptera, Pyraloidea) and phylogenetic implications

Liu

Zhang

et al. 2022

Arch Insect Biochem Physiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Detailed phylogenetic studies, as well as studies on life cycles and evo-devo research are needed to understand the evolutionary processes that shaped the diversity and biology of aquatic and semi-aquatic moths. Genome sequencing of at least some taxa representing various ecological groups, especially from the Acentropinae, could also supply relevant data (Park et al, 2014;Ye and You, 2016;Chen et al, 2017a). To answer many important questions about the ecology and evolution of aquatic moths, life cycles should be studied and linked with the results of phylogenetic studies (genus and/or species level).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It cannot be ruled out that similar adaptations occurred multiple times within the Crambidae. A recent study by Chen et al (2017a), involving molecular data, suggests that the Nymphula-type caterpillar (with hydrophobic cuticle and open spiracle system) evolved from the Parapoynx-type larva (with tracheal gills and closed spiracles). Although the current state of biodiversity inventories in different regions of the world preclude the completion of any comprehensive zoogeographical studies; it is worth mentioning that only two genera, Parapoynx and Elophila, are cosmopolitan (Mey and Speidel, 2008).…”

Section: So Many or So Few?mentioning

confidence: 99%

What is a moth doing under water? Ecology of aquatic and semi-aquatic Lepidoptera

Pabis

2018

Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper reviews the current knowledge on the ecology of aquatic and semi-aquatic moths, and discusses possible pre-adaptations of the moths to the aquatic environment. It also highlights major gaps in our understanding of this group of aquatic insects. Aquatic and semi-aquatic moths represent only a tiny fraction of the total lepidopteran diversity. Only about 0.5% of 165 000 known lepidopterans are aquatic; mostly in the preimaginal stages. Truly aquatic species can be found only among the Crambidae, Cosmopterigidae and Erebidae, while semi-aquatic forms associated with amphibious or marsh plants are known in thirteen other families. These lepidopterans have developed various strategies and adaptations that have allowed them to stay under water or in close proximity to water. Problems of respiratory adaptations, locomotor abilities, influence of predators and parasitoids, as well as feeding preferences are discussed. Nevertheless, the poor knowledge on their biology, life cycles, genomics and phylogenetic relationships preclude the generation of fully comprehensive evolutionary scenarios.

show abstract

“…O.Kuntze, Euryale ferox Salisb, Nymphaea tetragona Georgi, etc. [ 5 , 6 ]. Damage to the host plant is primarily through skeletonizing of the leaves caused by P .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Seasonal dynamics and spatial distribution pattern of Parapoynx crisonalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) on water chestnuts

Li¹,

Chen

Jie

et al. 2017

PLoS ONE

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Parapoynx crisonalis (Walker, 1859) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) is a major pest of aquatic vegetables and aquatic landscape plants. It has been responsible for causing considerable economic damage to water chestnut (Trapa natans) plants. In the Changsha vicinity of China, P. crisonalis has five generations a year. Populations of P. crisonalis were relatively low in April and began to rapidly rise at the beginning of May. At the end of July and early August, the population dropped dramatically. A rebound occurred at the end of August and early September, which was referred to as the second population peak. From then, until early November, the P. crisonalis population steadily diminished in preparation for overwintering. The primary factors influencing the seasonal dynamics of P. crisonalis were the climatic conditions, especially the temperature, and secondarily precipitation. Between May and October, the P. crisonalis adults were evenly distributed in the pond. In May and June, the eggs of P. crisonalis were present in an aggregate distribution, due to the effects of environmental heterogeneity. In July and August, however, they were found to be in a uniform distribution.

show abstract

The complete mitogenome of Parapoynx crisonalis (Walker, 1859) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae), with phylogenetic relationships amongst three acentropine larval forms

Cited by 5 publications

References 29 publications

Characterization of four mitochondrial genomes of Crambidae (Lepidoptera, Pyraloidea) and phylogenetic implications

Characterization of four mitochondrial genomes of Crambidae (Lepidoptera, Pyraloidea) and phylogenetic implications

What is a moth doing under water? Ecology of aquatic and semi-aquatic Lepidoptera

Seasonal dynamics and spatial distribution pattern of Parapoynx crisonalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) on water chestnuts

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About