2017
DOI: 10.1080/23802359.2017.1325341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The complete mitochondrial genome of the pentastomid Armillifer grandis (Pentastomida) from the Democratic Republic of Congo

Abstract: The complete mitochondrial genome of the pentastomid Armillifergrandis (Pentastomida) from the Democratic Republic of Congo, Mitochondrial DNA Part B, 2:1, 287-288,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(14 reference statements)
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As described for other related pentastomid mitogenomes (Grau et al. 2017 ; Naude et al. 2018 ), the mitochondrial genome of L. arctica contained an A + T bias with an overall base composition of 32.6% A, 27.5% T, 32.8% C, and 7.1% G. The gene arrangement of the present mitogenome is identical to those of other pentastomids (Lavrov et al.…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As described for other related pentastomid mitogenomes (Grau et al. 2017 ; Naude et al. 2018 ), the mitochondrial genome of L. arctica contained an A + T bias with an overall base composition of 32.6% A, 27.5% T, 32.8% C, and 7.1% G. The gene arrangement of the present mitogenome is identical to those of other pentastomids (Lavrov et al.…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
“…The complete mitochondrial transcript of L. arctica was 14,789 bp in length and contained 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 2 ribosomal RNA genes and 22 transfer RNA genes. As described for other related pentastomid mitogenomes (Grau et al 2017;Naude et al 2018), the mitochondrial genome of L. arctica contained an A þ T bias with an overall base composition of 32.6% A, 27.5% T, 32.8% C, and 7.1% G. The gene arrangement of the present mitogenome is identical to those of other pentastomids (Lavrov et al 2004;Li et al 2016;Grau et al 2017;Naude et al 2018).…”
supporting
confidence: 66%