2017
DOI: 10.1111/imm.12851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The competitive nature of signal transducer and activator of transcription complex formation drives phenotype switching of T cells

Abstract: Signal transducers and activators of transcription (STATs) are key molecular determinants of T-cell fate and effector function. Several inflammatory diseases are characterized by an altered balance of T-cell phenotypes and cytokine secretion. STATs, therefore, represent viable therapeutic targets in numerous pathologies. However, the underlying mechanisms by which the same STAT proteins regulate both the development of different T-cell phenotypes and their plasticity during changes in extracellular conditions … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(174 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike most other TFs we profiled, the changes in the binding of Stat3 in the absence of Batf did not have a strong association with changes to accessibility. This may suggest other means in which Batf exerts its effects in Stat3 sites, such as changes in the activity of binding competitors (Sadreev et al, 2018; Walker et al, 2013; Wingelhofer et al, 2018) and/or in post translational modifications at nearby histone tails (Chan and Maze, 2020). Notably, we observed a similar trend of low correlation between changes in binding versus changes in accessibility in the case of Fosl2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike most other TFs we profiled, the changes in the binding of Stat3 in the absence of Batf did not have a strong association with changes to accessibility. This may suggest other means in which Batf exerts its effects in Stat3 sites, such as changes in the activity of binding competitors (Sadreev et al, 2018; Walker et al, 2013; Wingelhofer et al, 2018) and/or in post translational modifications at nearby histone tails (Chan and Maze, 2020). Notably, we observed a similar trend of low correlation between changes in binding versus changes in accessibility in the case of Fosl2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it is known that STAT4/STAT1 can form heterodimers in response to IL-35, an immunosuppressive cytokine associated with the generation of Tregs and with poor prognosis in some types of cancer. It is possible that the STAT4/STAT1 heterodimer may be related to anti-inflammatory programs [ 114 , 115 , 116 , 117 ]. There are intrinsic factors responsible for such vast plasticity to the transcriptional outcome generated by the JAK/STAT signaling pathway, and thus the response elicited by a cell or tissue.…”
Section: Jak/stat Pathway and Cervical Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of STAT1 inhibition could not be tested, since we found no STAT1 specific inhibitor that was commercially available. In mice and man, STAT1 is important for the differentiation of naive CD4 + T cells to Th1 cells (28) or to type 1 regulatory (Tr) T cells (29). From these findings, we conclude that after immune stimulation, control lymphocytes use the STAT1 pathway and we hypothesize that control cows react with a Th1 or Tr immune response in polyclonal stimulation assays.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%