2016
DOI: 10.1021/acschembio.6b00167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Competitive Interplay between Allosteric HIV-1 Integrase Inhibitor BI/D and LEDGF/p75 during the Early Stage of HIV-1 Replication Adversely Affects Inhibitor Potency

Abstract: Allosteric HIV-1 integrase inhibitors (ALLINIs) have recently emerged as a promising class of antiretroviral agents and are currently in clinical trials. In infected cells, ALLINIs potently inhibit viral replication by impairing virus particle maturation but surprisingly exhibit a reduced EC50 for inhibiting HIV-1 integration in target cells. To better understand the reduced antiviral activity of ALLINIs during the early stage of HIV-1 replication, we investigated the competitive interplay between a potent rep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
30
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
6
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our experiments, the relative inhibition of LEDGF/p75 interaction with IN polymorphs strikingly matches the corresponding ARV activity at integration of INLAIs. This finding is also in agreement with the previous reports showing that competition by LEDGF/p75 controls the INLAImediated inhibition of integration and weakens its magnitude compared to the ARV potency at late stage that does not suffer from such competition (15,(37)(38)(39).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In our experiments, the relative inhibition of LEDGF/p75 interaction with IN polymorphs strikingly matches the corresponding ARV activity at integration of INLAIs. This finding is also in agreement with the previous reports showing that competition by LEDGF/p75 controls the INLAImediated inhibition of integration and weakens its magnitude compared to the ARV potency at late stage that does not suffer from such competition (15,(37)(38)(39).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The close correlation that we observed between the level of IN multimerization and the potency of INLAI ARV activity in multipleround infection assays provides further evidence that aberrant IN multimerization is the primary biochemical mechanism for the of INLAIdependent viral maturation defect. It was also reported that modulating LEDGF/p75 levels in target cells (by knockout or overexpression) determines INLAI BI-D potency at integration (37). In our experiments, the relative inhibition of LEDGF/p75 interaction with IN polymorphs strikingly matches the corresponding ARV activity at integration of INLAIs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ligand efficiency (LE) for compound 5 was calculated to be 0.38 kcal/mol per non-hydrogen atom (40,41). This compares favorably to the LE of 0.31 kcal/mol per non-hydrogen atom for direct binding of a highly potent representative ALLINI, BI-D, to IN (42). The inhibition of LEDGF/ p75-dependent activity could be due to (i) compound-induced aberrant protein multimerization of IN resulting in inactivation, (ii) the compound competing with IN binding to LEDGF/ p75, or (iii) a combination of these activities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Surprisingly, ALLINIs exhibit higher potency when present during virion morphogenesis compared with the early stage of viral replication [29,3437]. In the virions, where due to the lack of competing LEDGF/p75 binding to the IN dimer, ALLINIs potently induce aberrant IN multimerization and result in eccentric, non-infectious virions; whereas during the early stage of HIV-1 replication LEDGF/p75 effectively competes with ALLINI binding to IN and reduces the inhibitor potency [38]. Selection of HIV-1 phenotypes under the genetic pressure of various ALLINIs have identified substitutions at the IN dimer interface at the inhibitor binding sites that confer resistance to these compounds [25,28,39,40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%