The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-07926-4_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Competitive Analysis Method for Evaluating Water Level Visualization Tools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Twenty-one interactive dashboards were analyzed and compared through interviews with developers in addition to a competitive analysis [9]. Competitive analyses are used for comparing similar systems and are commonly used in the prototype phase of a new product [24], [25]. The analysis aimed to answer the following list of questions.…”
Section: Comparing and Analyzing Twenty-one Dashboardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twenty-one interactive dashboards were analyzed and compared through interviews with developers in addition to a competitive analysis [9]. Competitive analyses are used for comparing similar systems and are commonly used in the prototype phase of a new product [24], [25]. The analysis aimed to answer the following list of questions.…”
Section: Comparing and Analyzing Twenty-one Dashboardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assessment of the collected maps draws on content analysis, a systematic approach already used in cartographic research to analyse and compare maps [30][31][32]. The content analysis method relies on identifying a set of codes which serve as operational rules that specify the definitions and intensities of different components in the maps being analysed.…”
Section: Assessment Of Map Graphics On Existing Crisis Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graphic or pictorial symbols (pictograms) created by simplifying the essential external or symbolic characteristics of discrete objects, were used most to represent objects, phenomena, and actions specific to crisis management (on 46 maps-numbered 3, 5,6,7,15,18,19,20,21,22,23,25,26,28,31,32,35,37,41,42,44,45,46,47,56,57,68,72,74,78,80,81,82,83,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,97,98, and 99 in Figure S1). The use of geometric symbols derived from basic geometric figures was observed on one crisis map (map 46 in Figure S1), where data important to military operations were added to the topographic map with the aid of geometric symbols.…”
Section: Basic Geometric and Graphic Elements And Visual Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• the interface is designed to support a wide variety of application domains • the interface is the first of its kind and has few extant parallels for comparison • a robust work domain analysis already was completed • at the final stages of design and development Roth et al [51] automated evaluation…”
Section: Guidelines and Heuristic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%