Abstract:The use of renewable energy sources in buildings is more and more common (both for heating and cooling purposes, as well as electricity generation). The paper focuses on the thermal comfort tests in two buildings: the traditional one (that uses non-renewable sources of energy) and the modern intelligent building “Energis” of Kielce University of Technology. The thermal sensations of students in these two buildings have been compared based on the questionnaire survey and conclusions have been drawn regarding th… Show more
“…Only one room was too cold for the respondents, therefore they want the temperature in the room to be warmer. Comparing with the results from [3], the respondents preferred warmer thermal conditions. The respondents were also asked about the assessment of air humidity (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…International standards ([1], [2]) on thermal comfort determination were developed after the foundations laid by a pioneer in this field, namely O. Fanger originating from the 1960's. Recent studies [3] on thermal comfort in a smart building have shown that there is a difference between subjective feelings and actual results. Similar conclusions were observed in the authors [4,5].…”
Thermal comfort is of fundamental importance for people staying in a closed environment. The article focuses on research on thermal comfort in a smart building. The study was performed using two methods. The first method with the Testo 400 microclimate meter, the second method with anonymous questionnaires. The microclimate meter made it possible to measure air parameters (including temperature, humidity, speed, CO2 concentration). The anonymous poll included questions about the thermal sensations vote, thermal preferences, thermal acceptability vote, air humidity and humidity preferences vote. Students from Poland, faculty of Environmental, Geomatic and Energy Engineering, participated in the study. The research showed that the respondents preferred lower thermal conditions with the temperature range from 22.4 °C to 25.1 °C. The percentage of the students who found the conditions as unsatisfactory - has exceeded the permitted 10% range.
“…Only one room was too cold for the respondents, therefore they want the temperature in the room to be warmer. Comparing with the results from [3], the respondents preferred warmer thermal conditions. The respondents were also asked about the assessment of air humidity (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…International standards ([1], [2]) on thermal comfort determination were developed after the foundations laid by a pioneer in this field, namely O. Fanger originating from the 1960's. Recent studies [3] on thermal comfort in a smart building have shown that there is a difference between subjective feelings and actual results. Similar conclusions were observed in the authors [4,5].…”
Thermal comfort is of fundamental importance for people staying in a closed environment. The article focuses on research on thermal comfort in a smart building. The study was performed using two methods. The first method with the Testo 400 microclimate meter, the second method with anonymous questionnaires. The microclimate meter made it possible to measure air parameters (including temperature, humidity, speed, CO2 concentration). The anonymous poll included questions about the thermal sensations vote, thermal preferences, thermal acceptability vote, air humidity and humidity preferences vote. Students from Poland, faculty of Environmental, Geomatic and Energy Engineering, participated in the study. The research showed that the respondents preferred lower thermal conditions with the temperature range from 22.4 °C to 25.1 °C. The percentage of the students who found the conditions as unsatisfactory - has exceeded the permitted 10% range.
“…However, for the second building, research was carried out in January 2022. Air temperature, relative air humidity and air velocity for the traditional building are 27.7 o C, 47.60% and 0.05 m/s [3], while for the intelligent one: 25.1 o C, 29.72% and 0.09 m/s.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In this study, a study was carried out for two buildings, a school building and an intelligent building of Energis of the Kielce University of Technology. The results for the first building were taken from the article [3]. However, for the second building, research was carried out in January 2022.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, many researchers are involved in research on thermal comfort in school buildings, homes, universities, and offices, and less in intelligent buildings. The research on thermal comfort in intelligent buildings was carried out by Krawczyk and Krakowiak [3], who compared the results of an intelligent building with a traditional building. The research shows a difference between the PMV index and the actual results from the questionnaires.…”
Abstract. The article presents the perception of thermal comfort in two buildings, intelligent and traditional. 32 people aged 18 to 22 and one women aged 52 participated in the study. Two indicators were analyzed, PMV (Predicted Mean Vote) and PPD (Predicted Percentage of Dissatisfied). The analysis consisted in comparing the actual feelings of the respondents with the results based on Fanger's model. The assessment of air humidity and thermal preferences are also shown.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.