The Comparison Of The Open And Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Is There Any Outcome Difference Between Non-complicated And Complicated Appendicisit?

Bıçakçı, Ünal; Tander, Burak; Günaydın, Mithat; Rizalar, Rıza; Arıtürk, Ender; Ayyıldız, Suat H.; Bernay, Ferit

doi:10.5174/tutfd.2010.04604.1

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 18 publications

(16 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Laparoscopic appendectomy provides less postoperative pain, shorter LOHS, better cosmetics and lower complication and surgical site infection rates in the management of acute appendicitis [7]. Perforated appendicitis in childhood occurs mostly due to the delays in hospital admission and improper management of abdominal pain.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis in children: Is intraperitoneal drainage necessary?

Günaydın

Demirel²,

Bernay³

et al. 2015

J Clin Exp Invest

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ÖZETAmaç: Bu çalışmada amacımız, perfore apandisitlerde intraperitoneal drenajın gerekliliğini değerlendirmektir. Results: Statistically significant differences were observed between laparoscopic perforated appendicitis (71 male, 35 female; median 9.5 years) and open perforated appendicitis (108 male, 61 female; median 9 years) groups in terms of placement of nasogastric tube (102/106 vs.169/169) (p=0.021), length of hospital stay (1.67± 0.11 days vs. 2.34± 0.09 days) (p<0.001), intraperitoneal drainage (32/106 vs. 138/169), (p<0.001), duration of intraperitoneal drainage (1.66± 0.28 vs. 4.21± 0.2 days) and LOHS (5.82± 0.3 vs. 4.23± 0.6 days) respectively (p <0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of development of intra-abdominal abscess (10/106 vs. 9/169), (p=0.144), surgical site infection (2/106 vs. 8/169), (p=0.187) and development of adhesive intestinal obstruction (1/106 vs. 9/169) (p=0.053). Conclusion:Laparoscopic access reduces the necessity for drainage and shortens duration of nasogastric tube and length of hospital stay. J Clin Exp Invest 2015; 6 (3): 224-227

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%