2016
DOI: 10.1117/12.2245060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The comparison of single-band and dual-band infrared detection of small targets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhou et al [29] applied joint sparse representation in dual-band dim target detection, which achieves better detection performance, yet is also time consuming. Yang et al [30] found that dual-band detection can extract the apparent area and equivalent temperature of a small target, while a single-band infrared detector can only get the radiation intensity information. Yu et al [31] proved that the probability of detection based on dual-band optimization is obviously better than that of any single-band detector relying on the NP criterion, and the traditional morphological Top-hat algorithm was adopted to simulate man-made targets for detection fusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhou et al [29] applied joint sparse representation in dual-band dim target detection, which achieves better detection performance, yet is also time consuming. Yang et al [30] found that dual-band detection can extract the apparent area and equivalent temperature of a small target, while a single-band infrared detector can only get the radiation intensity information. Yu et al [31] proved that the probability of detection based on dual-band optimization is obviously better than that of any single-band detector relying on the NP criterion, and the traditional morphological Top-hat algorithm was adopted to simulate man-made targets for detection fusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%