The comparison of health status and health services utilisation between Indigenous and non‐Indigenous infants in Australia

Abstract

Objective: To examine the differences in health services utilisation and the associated risk factors between Indigenous and non‐Indigenous infants at a national level in Australia. Methods: We analysed data from a national representative longitudinal study, the Longitudinal Study for Australian Children (LSAC) starting in 2004. We used survey logistic regression and survey multiple linear regression to examine the factors associated with health services utilisation. Results: Health status of Indigenous infants was poorer than that of non‐Indigenous. In comparison to non‐Indigenous infants, in the previous 12‐month period, the Indigenous infants were significantly less likely to use the following health services: maternal and child health centre or help lines (OR=0.35, 95%CI: 0.24‐0.49); maternal and child health nurse visits (OR=0.45, 95%CI: 0.32‐0.63); general practitioners (GPs) (OR=0.45, 95%CI: 0.31‐0.64); and paediatrician (OR=0.52, 95%CI: 0.35‐0.77). In contrast, they were more likely to visit a hospital outpatient clinic (OR=1.82, 95%CI: 1.16‐2.85). Mothers' age, education and marital status were associated with certain health services use. Financial status and residential location were the important predictors of the use of health services. Conclusion: The rates of health services utilisation by Indigenous infants were lower and were associated with mothers' characteristics and socio‐economic status. Implications: The gaps in health services utilisation between Indigenous and non‐Indigenous infant requires immediate policy initiatives. Further research is needed to explore the causal pathways between health status, health services utilisation and multiple risk factors at different levels.

Socio-demographic disparities in the utilisation of general practice services for Australian children - Results from a nationally representative longitudinal study

“…However, our previous studies using the similar data had found that Indigenous children were more likely to have poor physical health outcomes, were twice likely to have a medical condition or disability, and were more likely to have medical care needs compared to their non-Indigenous counterparts [9, 32]. The current study also demonstrated that there were higher proportions of Indigenous children whose health status were fair or poor, suggesting more needs in health care.…”

Greener neighbourhoods, slimmer children? Evidence from 4423 participants aged 6 to 13 years in the Longitudinal Study of Australian children

“…28 Therefore, socio-economic measures which are known to influence BMI were included to adjust for this potential source of confounding. The socioeconomic measures chosen were (i) combined weekly income of caregivers (in thousands); (ii) whether the child was of Australian Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander heritage (binary variable); 29 (iii) whether the child spoke a language other than English at home; and (iv) the number of years of education the mother had received. Maternal education years were calculated according to the methodology of Blakemore, Gibbings and Strazdins, 30 where the total number of years that the mother had received education are placed on a scale ranging from 0 (that is, never attended school) to 20 (completed postgraduate degree).…”

‘Doing the hard yards’: carer and provider focus group perspectives of accessing Aboriginal childhood disability services

“…Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (hereafter, Aboriginal Australian) children experience inferior health outcomes when compared to other Australian children and this includes higher rates of disability [1,2]. The issues around Aboriginal childhood disability are complex and multifaceted.…”