The Comparison of Foveal Sensitivity Between Diabetic and Non-diabetic Patients by Using Standard Automated Perimetry 10-2 Protocol: A Cross-Sectional Study

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to assess whether standard automated perimetry (SAP) was capable of detecting early neuroretinal changes by comparing foveal sensitivity in diabetic and non-diabetic subjects. Settings and designThis is an observational and cross-sectional study that compared foveal sensitivity between a case group of 47 subjects with no or mild-to-moderate diabetic retinopathy (DR) without maculopathy and a control group of 43 healthy subjects. Materials and MethodsAfter a thorough ocular examination, all patients were put through tests using a Humphrey visual field analyzer with the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm (SITA) standard system (10-2 software). The primary indicator of success was the age-adjusted foveal awareness-esteem difference. Mean deviation (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD) readings were the supplementary performance indicators. ResultsThe mean age of the case and control group was 50.76 ± 13.20 years and 49.90 ± 12.20 years, respectively. The probability of cataract development was higher in the case group (p < 0.0001). In the control group, 95.3% had best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in the category of good visual acuity (VA) (p < 0.0001). The mean foveal sensitivity in the case group was 28.57 ± 7.54 and 32.16 ± 7.09 for the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.023). The mean of MD in the case group was -6.05 ± 7.93, whereas in the control group, it was -3.28 ± 1.70, which was found significant (p = 0.027). There was no difference in PSD between the study groups. ConclusionsFoveal sensitivity decreased in diabetics, even without maculopathy, so SAP helps identify a patient at risk of future vision loss.