2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2006.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The comparison index: A tool for assessing the accuracy of image segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
110
0
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
110
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Local and global validation according to [18] was carried out against 2,235 digitized fields to select the best segmentation settings. First each reference field and the corresponding image objects were considered (local validation).…”
Section: Segmentation Of Agricultural Fields Using Pan-sharpened Spotmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Local and global validation according to [18] was carried out against 2,235 digitized fields to select the best segmentation settings. First each reference field and the corresponding image objects were considered (local validation).…”
Section: Segmentation Of Agricultural Fields Using Pan-sharpened Spotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The challenge is to find the optimal segmentation parameters, as to derive image objects which resemble real world objects as closely as possible. In most remote sensing studies, segmentations have been evaluated, in order to avoid over-or under-segmentation, either visually [15] or by using complex (mathematical) approaches [17,18]. With regard to the subsequent classification simple and practicable quality estimation metrics are highly desirable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many approaches in calculating the accuracy assessment of segmentation based on literature but the most common method used is by visual Previous researchers have used different type of segmentation validation by overlapping the area that intersect between output segmented area with reference area (Möller et al, 2007). Another researcher used the distance between two centroids to assess the segmentation accuracy (Ke, Quackenbush, & Im, 2010).…”
Section: Crown Projection Area (Cpa) Delineation and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand , Gougeon (1995) had developed the segmentation validation using 1:1 spatial corresponding based on goodness of fit (D). However, Clinton et al, (2010) had improve the segmentation validation method developed by Ke et al, (2010) and Möller et al, (2007) by modifying the relative area metrics by calculating Equation (3) and (4) and measuring the goodness of fit by using Equation (5).…”
Section: Crown Projection Area (Cpa) Delineation and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, segmented objects from different image often vary geometrically due to some factors including illumination conditions, view angles and meteorological conditions [34]. Additionally, the segmentation process sometimes suffers from under-segmentation and over-segmentation errors, which may create objects that do not accurately represent real-world feature [35]. Thus, uncertainty in the object-based methods exists inevitably.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%