Abstract:There are differences in the overall costs and cost breakdown in the clinical management patterns of MI and IS in Europe. These differences seem to arise as a result of local treatment pattern specificities as well as the availability of specific and well-adapted structures for patients' rehabilitation. Further studies are necessary to fully explain these differences. The assessment of the total medical costs of managing an atherothrombotic patient over a 2-year period (MI, IS, established PAD) has to take int… Show more
“…First, we estimate the average cost of hospital treatment for ACS to be about 12.101 Euro. These results appear to be in line with the findings of other investigations [6,7,20,21]. Levy et al described an amount of 12.393 Euro for the cost of treating a myocardial infarction in the Swiss population.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Levy et al described an amount of 12.393 Euro for the cost of treating a myocardial infarction in the Swiss population. Their estimation, however, was based on a smaller sample size [7]. Matsui and colleagues found the same duration of stay in the intensive care unit (two days) in the late nineties, but a longer hospitalization on the general ward in Switzerland (12 days).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a few studies have compared the medical costs of ACS from a European perspective, and involve only a small non-representative number of Swiss data [1,6,7].…”
Aims The aim of this study was to investigate inpatient costs of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in Switzerland and to assess the main cost drivers associated with this disease.
Methods and ResultsWe used the national multicenter registry AMIS (acute myocardial infarction in Switzerland) which includes a representative number of 65 hospitals and a total of 11.623 patient records. The following cost modules were analyzed: hospital stay, percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and thrombolysis. Expenses were assessed using data from official Swiss national statistical sources. Mean total costs per patient were 12.101 Euro (median 10.929 Euro; 95% CI: 1.161-27.722 Euro). The length of stay ranged from one to 129 days with a mean of 9.5 days (median 8.0 days; 95% CI: 1-23). Overall costs were independently influenced by age, gender and existent co-morbidities, e.g. cerebrovascular disease and diabetes (p<0.0001). Conclusion Our study determined specific causes for the high costs associated with hospital treatment on a large representative sample. The results should highlight unnecessary expenses and help policy makers to evaluate the base case for a DRG (Diagnosis Related Groups) scenario in Switzerland. Cost weighting of the identified secondary diagnosis should be considered in the calculation and coding of a primary diagnosis for ACS.
“…First, we estimate the average cost of hospital treatment for ACS to be about 12.101 Euro. These results appear to be in line with the findings of other investigations [6,7,20,21]. Levy et al described an amount of 12.393 Euro for the cost of treating a myocardial infarction in the Swiss population.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Levy et al described an amount of 12.393 Euro for the cost of treating a myocardial infarction in the Swiss population. Their estimation, however, was based on a smaller sample size [7]. Matsui and colleagues found the same duration of stay in the intensive care unit (two days) in the late nineties, but a longer hospitalization on the general ward in Switzerland (12 days).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a few studies have compared the medical costs of ACS from a European perspective, and involve only a small non-representative number of Swiss data [1,6,7].…”
Aims The aim of this study was to investigate inpatient costs of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in Switzerland and to assess the main cost drivers associated with this disease.
Methods and ResultsWe used the national multicenter registry AMIS (acute myocardial infarction in Switzerland) which includes a representative number of 65 hospitals and a total of 11.623 patient records. The following cost modules were analyzed: hospital stay, percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and thrombolysis. Expenses were assessed using data from official Swiss national statistical sources. Mean total costs per patient were 12.101 Euro (median 10.929 Euro; 95% CI: 1.161-27.722 Euro). The length of stay ranged from one to 129 days with a mean of 9.5 days (median 8.0 days; 95% CI: 1-23). Overall costs were independently influenced by age, gender and existent co-morbidities, e.g. cerebrovascular disease and diabetes (p<0.0001). Conclusion Our study determined specific causes for the high costs associated with hospital treatment on a large representative sample. The results should highlight unnecessary expenses and help policy makers to evaluate the base case for a DRG (Diagnosis Related Groups) scenario in Switzerland. Cost weighting of the identified secondary diagnosis should be considered in the calculation and coding of a primary diagnosis for ACS.
“…Nine studies (12,(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42) reported costs associated with CAD overall or specifically for myocardial infarction (MI), acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and angina. These studies are summarized in Table 5 and are discussed in more detail below.…”
Section: Cadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acute costs of MI and one-year follow-up also represented the largest proportion of the costs of MI in Europe when a decision tree model was used to estimate the two-year cost of MI in eight European countries (38). ACS: In a retrospective analysis of a managed care database (36), hospitalization and drug costs represented 72% and 7% of the twoyear medical costs associated with new-onset ACS patients, respectively.…”
Objective
To assess the efficiency of Dyevert™ Power XT compared to the standard clinical practice when used for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI).
Methods
A Markov model was developed to estimate, over 3‐month cycles and a lifetime time horizon, the cumulative costs and health outcomes (life years gained [LYG] and quality‐adjusted life years [QALY]) in a hypothetical cohort of 1,000 patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) 3b‐4 and an average age of 72 years. The incidence of contrast‐induced acute kidney injury for these patients is 18.89% in routine practice and 7.78% with Dyevert. QALYs were estimated by applying utilities by health state. Transitions between states and utilities were obtained from the literature. Overall all‐cause and state‐specific mortality were considered. The total cost (€2,022) estimated with the National Health System perspective included cost of the procedure and of CKD management. The parameters were validated by a panel of experts. A discount rate (3% per year) was applied to costs and outcomes.
Results
The use of Dyevert yielded more health benefits (34.60 LYG and 5.69 QALYs) compared to the current standard practice (33.11 LYG and 5.38 QALYs). Lifetime cost accumulated at the end of the simulation resulted €30,211/patient with Dyevert and €33,895/patient with current standard clinical practice.
Conclusions
The use of Dyevert™ Power XT resulted dominant option, due to its higher effectiveness and lower cost as compared to standard clinical practice and, therefore, a preferred option in patients with CKD stages 3b‐4 undergoing PCI in Spain.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.