1985
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(85)90141-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The comparative effects of frontal, parietal, occipitotemporal, and limbic forebrain lesions in weanling rats on learning☆

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apoptosis, also known as programmed cell death, is a crucial biological process involved in maintaining development and tissue homeostasis. Inappropriate stimulation or inhibition of apoptosis can lead to several physiological imbalances and disorders (Thompson and Yu 1985). The consequences of apoptosis in Pb-induced damage to brain may reflect in behavioral, motor, and cognitive impairments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Apoptosis, also known as programmed cell death, is a crucial biological process involved in maintaining development and tissue homeostasis. Inappropriate stimulation or inhibition of apoptosis can lead to several physiological imbalances and disorders (Thompson and Yu 1985). The consequences of apoptosis in Pb-induced damage to brain may reflect in behavioral, motor, and cognitive impairments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Melatonin, which influences the cell differentiation and growth in a number of cell culture systems, has been shown to prevent in vitro and in vivo apoptosis in thymocytes (Sainz et al 1995;Roth, Rabin, and Agenello 1997;Mayo et al 1998). Melatonin alone has no effect on the of apoptosis can lead to several physiological imbalances and disorders (Thompson and Yu 1985). The consequences of apoptosis in Pb-induced damage to brain may reflect in behavioral, motor, and cognitive impairments.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether this observation relates to differences in lesion size or, rather, regional location and lateral extent of the injury awaits further experimentation. Because ofthe variety of instrumental tasks disrupted by extensive parietallesions, Thompson and his co11eagues (Thompson, Huestis, Crine11a, & Yu, 1986;Thompson & Yu, 1985) have classified the parietal neocortex as part ofthe brain's "general learning system." Also, Kesner, DiMattia, and Crutcher (1987), using radial maze methodologies that dissociate working-from reference-memory dysfunctions, have reported that an impainnent of reference memory, but not working memory, accompanies large parietallesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our choice of the term PAC was based on the limited neuroanatomical evidence (e.g., Lashley, 1941; and limited neurobehavioral evidence concerning the effects of small lesions in this .egion upon behavior (Boyd & Thomas, 1977;Thomas & Weir, 1975) av~ilable at the time. These studies, along with studies in other laboratories (e.g., Thompson, Huestis, Crinella, & Yu, 1986;Thompson & Yu, 1985), showed that bilateral PAC lesions resulted in disturbed spatial learning in a variety of mazes (e.g., Hebb-Williams, Lashley III mazes) or mazelike (e.g., Y-or T-maze spatial position reversal and spatial alternation; Kolb et aI., 1983;McDaniel, Davall, & Waters, 1989; tasks. Recently, the influences of similar lesions have been extended to the Maier 3-table task (Thinus-Blanc, Save, Poucet, & Foreman, 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%