1983
DOI: 10.1002/cne.902180310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The comparative effects of early‐life undernutrition and subsequent differential environments on the dendritic branching of pyramidal cells in rat visual cortex

Abstract: Male rats were either undernourished or fed normally from birth to day 21, after which time food was made freely available. At 1 month of age littermate pairs from both nutritional groups were housed in either enriched or impoverished conditions for 30 days and then killed for brain measurements. Significant deficits due to undernutrition were observed in the weight and size of the cerebrum, but not in the thickness or area of the visual cortex. Although there were large differences of between 21 and 39% in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the magnitude of dendritic regression in the present sample is nearly identical to that in a methodologically similar study on Wernicke's area (Jacobs and Scheibel, 1993): about an 11% decrease in both TDL and MSL from the younger to the older groups. These decreases were localized primarily to third-order and higher dendritic segments, thereby providing support for 1) the relative stability of more primary branches (Carughi et al, 1989), 2) the greater epigenetic sensitivity of more distal segments (Jones and Thomas, 1962;Smit et al, 1972;Greenough and Volkmar, 1973;Uylings et al, 1978;Greenough et al, 1979;Davies and Katz, 1983), and 3) the distoproximal theory of dendritic degeneration (Feldman, 1977;Cupp and Uemura, 1980). Although actual age-related increases in dendritic segment length could not be identified in the present investigation, previous research suggests that proliferative changes are likely (Buell andColeman, 1979, 1981;Flood et al, 1985).…”
Section: Life-span Changes In Dendritic Systemsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In fact, the magnitude of dendritic regression in the present sample is nearly identical to that in a methodologically similar study on Wernicke's area (Jacobs and Scheibel, 1993): about an 11% decrease in both TDL and MSL from the younger to the older groups. These decreases were localized primarily to third-order and higher dendritic segments, thereby providing support for 1) the relative stability of more primary branches (Carughi et al, 1989), 2) the greater epigenetic sensitivity of more distal segments (Jones and Thomas, 1962;Smit et al, 1972;Greenough and Volkmar, 1973;Uylings et al, 1978;Greenough et al, 1979;Davies and Katz, 1983), and 3) the distoproximal theory of dendritic degeneration (Feldman, 1977;Cupp and Uemura, 1980). Although actual age-related increases in dendritic segment length could not be identified in the present investigation, previous research suggests that proliferative changes are likely (Buell andColeman, 1979, 1981;Flood et al, 1985).…”
Section: Life-span Changes In Dendritic Systemsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In fact, the magnitude of dendritic regression in the present sample is nearly identical to that in a methodologically similar study on Wernicke's area (Jacobs and Scheibel, 1993): about an 11% decrease in both TDL and MSL from the younger to the older groups. These decreases were localized primarily to third-order and higher dendritic segments, thereby providing support for 1) the relative stability of more primary branches (Carughi et al, 1989), 2) the greater epigenetic sensitivity of more distal segments (Jones and Thomas, 1962;Smit et al, 1972;Greenough and Volkmar, 1973;Uylings et al, 1978;Greenough et al, 1979;Davies and Katz, 1983), and 3) the distoproximal theory of dendritic degeneration (Feldman, 1977;Cupp and Uemura, 1980).…”
Section: Life-span Changes In Dendritic Systemsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…environments in which animals are housed socially in groups and provided with novel objects to explore and manipulate) during critical periods in development produces a number of neuroanatomical effects that are associated with functional changes in behavior. For instance, rats reared under conditions of environmental enrichment have greater cortical mass (Rosenzweig et al , 1962; Bennett et al , 1969), have greater dendritic branching (Davies and Katz, 1983; Johansson and Belichenko, 2002), and perform better on learning and memory tasks (Kobayashi et al , 2002; Dhanushkodi et al , 2007) than rats reared in isolation. There is also a growing body of evidence that environmental enrichment influences an organism's sensitivity to centrally acting drugs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%