1996
DOI: 10.1093/arclin/11.6.513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The comparability of the WRAT-R reading test and NAART as estimates of premorbid intelligence in neurologically impaired patients

Abstract: A study by Wiens, Bryan, and Crossen (1993) suggests the Wide Range Achievement Test-Revised (WRAT-R) Reading subtest and North American Adult Reading Test (NAART) are adequate predictors of Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R) IQ scores for a normal population. Although it is common practice to use reading scores to estimate premorbid IQ in clinical populations, the WRAT-R and NAART have not been compared using individuals with brain dysfunction. The current study cross-validated the Wiens et al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
1
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
31
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 4 compares these classifications with those made using the WAT to predict scores on the BWM-R. In sum, the WAT is similar to other reading tests in successfully predicting scores in average ranges on cognitive batteries but tends to underestimate higher than average scores and over-estimate lower than average scores (Johnstone et al, 1996). The WAT appears weaker at predicting above average scores, although a sample with more numerous, highly educated participants would be necessary to confirm this result.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Table 4 compares these classifications with those made using the WAT to predict scores on the BWM-R. In sum, the WAT is similar to other reading tests in successfully predicting scores in average ranges on cognitive batteries but tends to underestimate higher than average scores and over-estimate lower than average scores (Johnstone et al, 1996). The WAT appears weaker at predicting above average scores, although a sample with more numerous, highly educated participants would be necessary to confirm this result.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Medical comorbidity was assessed with the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) (Miller et al, 1992). At pre-ECT baseline, the North American Adult Reading Test (NAART) provided an estimate of premorbid intelligence (Johnstone et al, 1996). An extensive neuropsychological battery was administered at pre-ECT baseline, within days of completing the ECT course, and at 6-month (24-week) follow-up.…”
Section: Study Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, White et al used a measure of general intellectual abilities that did not generate group differences. We estimated IQ in our battery with a reading test commonly used as an estimate of premorbid intellectual abilities (Griffi n et al, 2002 ;Johnstone et al, 1996 ).…”
Section: Neuropsychological Functioningmentioning
confidence: 99%